Jump to content

Anti-football

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.28.213.244 (talk) at 17:54, 26 August 2012 (→‎Style). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"Anti-football" is a term used to describe a lethargic passing style of football that relies only on passing and an extremely defensive, aggressive physical, robust style of play of football where one team deploys their whole team, except the striker, behind the ball. In doing so, they try their best to stop the opposition from scoring, rather than trying to win the game themselves. It is also used to criticize the playing style of teams who have no intention to play properly and prevent the game from moving on with actions such as (but not limited to): shooting the ball forward without trying to reach any players, intentionally diving and stopping the play during several minutes or shooting the ball away when a free-kick is awarded, to win time (usually penalized with a yellow card if too flagrant).


History and usage

The phrase has been in use in English since at least 2001, where Gary Armstrong and Richard Giulianotti used the phrase in their book Fear and Loathing in World Football to describe the tactics of Argentine team Estudiantes de La Plata in the 1968 Copa Intercontinental, citing usage of the phrase in a 1968 editorial in the Argentine sports magazine El Gráfico.[1]

The phrase was used by Johan Cruyff in 2002 to criticise the tactics that helped Brazil to win the World Cup, stating: "Brazil deserved their win but they aren't a team; they play anti-football and only took advantage of the mistakes of their opponents."[2]

In November 2006, Arsenal's Cesc Fàbregas used the term to describe the style of play in the English Premier League, in the week following a 1-0 defeat to West Ham United, stating: "Teams just defend, defend, and defend; they try to waste time. I call it 'anti-football,' but we have to accept this happens and break teams down."[3]

In 2010, Johan Cruyff again used the phrase 'anti-football' but on this occasion applying it to the style of play used by his own country's national team, the Netherlands, in the 2010 FIFA World Cup final against Spain. The day after the final Cruyff attacked the Dutch team for renouncing the Netherlands' long standing commitment to playing attacking and entertaining football: "They [the Netherlands] didn't want the ball. And regrettably, sadly, they played very dirty. So much so that they should have been down to nine immediately, then they made two [such] ugly and hard tackles that even I felt the damage. This ugly, vulgar, hard, hermetic, hardly eye-catching, hardly football style, yes it served the Dutch to unsettle Spain. If with this they got satisfaction, fine, but they ended up losing. They were playing anti-football." Other commentators had already described the Dutch style of play during the tournament and particularly the final as anti-football prior to Cruyff's comments. [4]

More recently, FC Barcelona and Spanish National Football Team are criticized for using sterile anti football using no strikers and only midfielders. This produces less goals because of no attacking stance and only passing creates an anti football game and creates a boring football game. [5] [6]

After being defeated 2-0, Vietnam coach Henrique Calisto used the phrase 'anti-football' referring to the tactic used against his team by surprise winner Philippines at the 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup group stage in Vietnam.[7]

Style

A more proper name for this tactical style is "Extremely Defensive", or "Excessive passing" based on the technique used and relies on waiting and repelling attacks or keeping the ball while trying to take advantage for every minimal mistakes of the adversary, as well as aiming to prevent smooth play for as long as possible. This requires fierce defenders, an excellent goalkeeper and a striker able enough to exploit few goal chances, and actions to disrupt the normal course of a game. National teams worldwide famous for using this style are Uruguay and Paraguay, but they have some differences. Uruguay tends to a Total Football approach because of the dynamics of their midfielders, while Paraguay is closer to the Catenaccio system. A strongest national team that plays Extremely Defensive is Italy. One not so well known national team which is Bosnia and Herzegovnia play Extremely Defensive but they simply don't play that well. Six of the domestic leagues in europe, which are Italian Serie A, Greek Super League, Swiss Super League, Belgium Pro League, Scottish Premier League and Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovnia consist of most club teams except for some club teams play Extremely Defensive. Now a days Extremely Defensive is not as affective as it use to be.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ Gary Armstrong & Richard Giulianotti (2001). Fear and Loathing in World Football. pp. p. 242. ISBN 978-1859734636. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  2. ^ "Cruyff slams World Cup, accuses Brazil of wrecking football". Daily Times. 2 July 2002.
  3. ^ David Sheppard (10 November 2006). "Fabregas slates the 'anti-football' of Premiership rivals". Soccernet.
  4. ^ Press Association (12 July 2010). "World Cup final: Johan Cruyff hits out at 'anti-football' Holland". Guardian Unlimited.
  5. ^ "Sterile Spain". 6 October 2012.
  6. ^ "Sterile Barcelona". 2012-30-07. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ "Historic victory leaves McMenemy bewildered". AFF Suzuki Cup 2010. 6 December 2010.