Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FluxBB (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crashie (talk | contribs) at 19:23, 24 November 2012 (→FluxBB: keep, it's used by a lot of sites). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

FluxBB

AfDs for this article:
FluxBB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been tagged as needing independent sources for a few years, and concerns about the same have been on the article's talk page since 2008. No sources have shown up, so I think that this article fails the general notability guideline and should be deleted. I've looked for sources, but I found only forum and blog postings. MrOllie (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just came to this page from the FluxBB page, which I arrived at because it's notable and I wanted more information on it. ¦ Reisio (talk) 01:37, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I think it's used by many web sites (also some notable ones, e.g. on Arch Linux). Google finds 28 million pages if you search for "Powered by fluxbb". So I think we should keep the article. --Crashie (talk)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FluxBB_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=524687176"