Jump to content

Talk:Nikolai Klyuev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Westsomething (talk | contribs) at 01:29, 2 December 2012 (→‎LGBT poet: repeat to the vandal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

LGBT poet

The category of LGBT-poetry need to be added here. Westsomething (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some IP vandals are trying to erase any reference about homosexuality of Klyuev. There are numerous sources where many researchers of his biography and works came to the conclusion that Klyuev was indeed homosexual or have such line in his poetry (not only given that fact that he was executed after submitting to the newspaper his work which was expressing love feeling to the male). But there are No any source where his homosexuality is denying. So my message to this IP vandals - please provide the source where is clearly stated that Klyuev wasn't gay and LGBT category will be removed. Westsomething (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the source you're adding doesn't seem to be reliable (this Arthur Klesh isn't an expert, his name is completely unknown to any literary or online sources). There's no historical evidence of Klyuev's homosexuality, it's just a hypothesis based on poetry analysis. Besides, accusing your opponents of vandalism is a violation of WP:NPA. --89.31.118.162 (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a literature journal and your personal opinion is not the cause to delete information (there must be others users who will agree with you), first. Erasing information without adding anything is indeed - vandalism, the second. Please prove that you even added here anything in whole year. If you repeat your behavior i will escalate this to the resolution comission and you can receive a ban by the IP address based on the history of your edits. Article will get Improve status, so such behavior of preserving it in stub condition is by all means vandalism without questions. End of discussion. Westsomething (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]