User talk:Avs5221

Article on Autosomal DNA in South Asian populations

You obviously haven't read the article. And I don't understand what you mean by saying that the article reads like an essay without verifiable sources, especially since 90% of it consists of quotations from easily verifiable sources rather than personal opinion (listed below in the reference section). Can you please tell me which portions of it offended you so I can re-submit it please? The article can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Autosomal_DNA_of_South_Asian_populations

It's impossible to find good help these days!

Āryāvastra (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, it's already been re-submitted. Reads like an essay? That entire article is based on peer-reviewed sources. Anyway, I hope someone with better reading comprehension skills gets a chance to review it. Āryāvastra (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookie

Alpha Quadrant has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 1044 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

my wiki

Has my page been accepted ? Hey it says:"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources."The sources all known blogs and websites like indiewire and imdb. Which sources in particular are not reliable in your opinion? I'd like to get this page accepted. Please let me know. thank you.

here is the link to the article i've created: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mohamed_Dione

Tova Milo's submitted page

Dear Avs5221,

Thank you very much for the prompt review of my submitted page on Tova Milo. I have made some revisions to the page, please reconsider accepting it.

The mentioned award is considered one of the most important awards in the area (also listed as a notable award in other entries). I have added a citation from the award page stating that it is "awarded to the paper that had the most impact in terms of research, methodology, or transfer to practice over the intervening decade" in this premier venue.

I have also added other evidence of notability based on (a) publications and citations and (b) membership in editorial boards of the major journals in the field. I went through the "notability" guidelines and this seems to adhere to them.

In general, I have imporved the article by adding more references as required.

Many thanks for your work.

-- Adding link to the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tova_Milo

Unreal Media Server

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Unreal_Media_Server

OK, we don't have major INDEPENDENT OF SUBJECT magazines that have articles about this software. Why would they publish such an article? If you look through the references, you find couple of industry-related magazines that reviewed our product. This proves you such a product exists in this industry, and reading the articles in these magazines you can verify the information I provided for Wikipedia article.

This is just a proprietary software product, and yes it does have coverage in magazines related to streaming media software. Hope this is clear to you.

Now you can say - this is still not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. OK, might be. But Wikipedia has articles discussing such proprietary software products, that's the thing. Take a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_streaming_media_systems

All products mentioned there are individual products that have more or less the same coverage in public sources as ours has. Our product has to be in this article, that's for sure! But it can't because you refuse to approve an article. What do you think about it?

Help, please

Hello, Avs5221. You have new messages at Boca Raton PL's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Two-Tier Enterprise Resource Planning Feedback

Hello, Avs5221. You have new messages at Merylk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shell Beach (band)

Hi! I already left some questions/comments on this talk page relating to this article you reviewed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Shell_Beach I can't find my previous comments, have they been deleted? I have made modifications to the article, should I re-submit? Thanks. Shellbeachband (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Resubmitted page for approval : Solidiance

Hi Avs5221,

I have applied the suggested amendments you specified previously on my article submission. Please therefore kindly check it out now and reconsider to approve it - or suggest more tips/clear guidance to help me enhance it in order to acquire an approval. The resubmitted page is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Solidiance

Thank you. 25 December 2012 | 12:29 AM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitaresti Astarini (talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Submission declined : Fix8(software)

Hello, thanks for your review. I understand that some of my references are not acceptable however I think one is. The reference ^5 is from an industry site (quantlabs) - and according to WP policy I believe is acceptable - please consider. The other references support some of the statements, ^1, ^2 and ^7. If I remove ^2, ^3, ^4, is that more acceptable? regards Ian.

Iammckane (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)--Iammckane (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

I have added an alternative reference and removed the blog/reddit refs. The quantlabs reference is a short entry written by the industry authors at quantlabs - who are respected and recognised within the HFT/finance community - this is how I found about about fix8. Iammckane (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)--Iammckane (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

afc speedy

As reviewing administrator, I do not consider that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Haim- choreographer is a BLP violation susceptible to speedy deletion. Only the BLP violations that fall within the general criteria at WP:CSD can be so deleted, and I do not see that this page was intended to abuse the subject, or that it contains negative or contentious unsourced information. We do not remove BLPs for merely being unsourced via speedy, even in mainspace. The procedure there is WP:BLPPROD, which removes them in 10 days if at least one reliable source is not added--and that does not apply to anything other than mainspace articles.

The relevant problems with this article are first and most important, whether it is a copyvio, probably from the users web site; second, whether it is too promotional at least in its current form, and third, whether it meets WP:CREATIVE. , My guess is that it's a copyvio--go check that first. DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

nd just the same for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David William Parry. DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I wasn't aware the review tool was CSDing articles in the background. That's my fault. avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 02:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Akira Shimada

Hello! I would like to improve it to a level of acceptance or start level. Please give me advice. I would like to read an appropriate article of a similar nature. How to deal with the newspaper story ? Thank you in advance. --Ichiro Kikuchi (talk) 05:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Kenneth Simmons

I've published Ken Simmons. I believe that an obituary in The Ibis meets our requirements to do so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)