User talk:Merylk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Merylk/Two-tier enterprise resource planning has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two-tier enterprise resource planning, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Help request[edit]

I have decided not to pursue this, but would like this removed so it doesn't affect any future work I do. I'm doing my best to be an unbiased contributor. I read in wiki help that we're not allowed to remove an editor's comments. What's the proper way to remove this without negative score?

I have moved this request to the bottom of the page - that is where new additions go, so as to keep things in order. The "this" you referred to was a warning notice from as long ago as 2009 which you had previously blanked and then copied back onto this page. Don't worry: with very few exceptions (explained at WP:BLANKING) the convention is that users are entitled to blank anything they like from their own talk pages. So I have blanked it again. If you remove a warning, that is taken as meaning that you have read it. Everything is retained, for the record, in the history of the talk page, but you can control what appears on the "top" version of the page.
Also, don't worry about "negative score" - Wikipedia doesn't work like that. It is such a complex site, and there are so many conventions and rules, that the only practical way to get involved is to have a go and make mistakes. As long as you learn from your mistakes, that is all anyone will ask. I think myself that Wikipedia should do more at account creation time to explain that it is not a "notice-board" site like Myspace and that it is particularly resistant to anything that looks like advertising or promotion; but the general view has been that it is better not to confront potential contributors with too much reading, for fear of putting them off.
In order to keep track of who said what when, it is helpful if you end each contribution to a talk page with four "tilde" characters ~~~~ which the system will convert into a "signature" of your username plus the time and date, like this: JohnCD (talk) 14:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Two-tier Enterprise Resource Planning Feedback[edit]

User: avs5221, thank you for reviewing two-tier enterprise resource planning (ERP). You say it's not suitable for Wikipedia. If it's not suitable, then enterprise resource planning needs to be removed. Please explain why it's not suitable or what do I need to do to make it suitable. I've implemented every recommendation from the editors (I also went into chat to confirm). I saw this entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_CRM and it has items in it that other Wiki editors told me to not use in my entry -- yet it was approved. Please explain the disparity. Thanks for your help.

I left this message for User: avs5221 on September 30, 2012. Yet, when I went to check User: avs5221 page, the new message notice was gone on November 3, but there was no response. Appreciate your valuable feedback.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two-tier enterprise resource planning concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two-tier enterprise resource planning, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 27 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)