Jump to content

Talk:Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.128.59.242 (talk) at 14:56, 30 January 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAwards Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

‹See TfM›

WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mr Solovyov again:

"Next year, the first nine winners will form the committee. Further on, other winners will be invited to sit on it. Each Milner winner will be expected to deliver a public lecture about his of her achievement in physics. This is important for raising public awareness of the importance of fundamental physics."

Does it mean that if an unknown scientist proposes a theoretical model that disaggrees with the work of winners, he will have no cance at all to win, EVEN IF EXPERIMENTAL FACTS AGGREE WITH HIS THEORY ?

Pr. Albert CAU http://albert.cau.free.fr/English/Lab.html