Talk:Irish Air Corps

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Ireland B‑class Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Who's responsible for defending Irish air space?

To the best of my knowledge the Irish Air Corps is primarily responsible. Although I think certain other parts of the Irish Defence Forces also bare that responsibility, such as the anti-aircraft systems that some units in the Irish Army (and possibly the Navy) have. Though if I was being honest, I'd say no-one is really defending Irish Airspace. --Hibernian 19:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In practice the RAF patrols Irish airspace; if anyone can incorporate that without sparking a massive Anglo-Irish edit war then go ahead. Yasha80.41.95.25 12:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Accrest.png

Image:Accrest.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste from Tribune and Irish Times

To the anon/vodafone mobile contributor who continues to post the same "copied and pasted" content from the Tribune and Irish Times: We cannot accept copyright materials. That content is a verbatim copy and paste from two copyrighted sources.[1][2]. It therefore cannot be included here in that form. If you MUST include some details on the controversies involving the Ministerial Transport Service, then SUMMARISE in your own words. But note that Wikipedia is not a new site - nor is it a soapbox for pushing agendas or analysis on current events! Guliolopez (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Motto

Forḟaire agus Tairiseaċt (Forfhaire agus Tairiseacht or Foraire agus Tairise in standardised spelling) literally means "Watching/Guarding and Loyalty/Steadfastness". Is "Watchful and Loyal" the official translation? I couldn't find any reference to either at http://mileata.ie/aircorps/index.htm ☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 11:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fighter retirement

The New Zealand Air Force article mentions the decision to terminate the fighter ability of the AF. Here, though, they just "fade away", with no reason or mention to the fact. BrickBreak (talk) 11:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Army Air Corps" v "Air Force"

The newly updated intro states that the Air Corps is closer to an "Army Air Corps" than an "Air Force". If I understand this correctly, what I think we're saying here is that the Air Corps operates more like an air support division of the army, rather than as a distinct/stand-alone force. If this is what we're saying, are there are any available cites to support this assertion? Or, at the very least, is there some clarification of wording (or definition of "Army Air Corps" v "Air Force") to explain this to the reader? Right now I don't think the intro is particularly clear in this regard. Guliolopez (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually - scratch that - I'm going to have to revert the whole thing. Because it's yet another COPYVIO copy and paste job from a third-party source.[3] Guliolopez (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Libya evacuation

I know this is a developing story, but it already seems to be a significant enough major operation to include. I'm presuming the two aircraft are the Learjet and the Gulfstream (the RTE picture may just be stock), rather than the CN-235s, but if anyone can dig up usable confirmation, that would be useful. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, seems it's the Learjet and one CN-235, after all. Nick Cooper (talk) 19:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cessna

Cessna's are a US company you have it listed as French — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.111.246 (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That column doesn't refer to the origin of the aircraft company. Rather to the origin of the aircraft. The Air Corps fly the Reims Cessna FR172H Rocket. These were built in Reims in France by Reims-Cessna. Hence it is valid to reference "France" as the origin of these aircraft. Guliolopez (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia Incorrectly Drawn

The three colour whirligig is incorrectly drawn. The correct construction is three semi-circles dispersed at 120º. Photographs of current aircraft illustrate that. The 1922 roundel design is incorrectly proportioned too. It should follow the 1:3:5 proportions of the RAF insignia of the period as it was a straight repaint. Sir smellybeard (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]