Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ks0stm (talk | contribs) at 08:07, 24 May 2013 (→‎User:Chris troutman: done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add request • view requests)


User:Cpt ricard

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Cpt ricard (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to help out as much as possible! Been a wikipedian for a long while and want to continue to give back in any way I can. Thanks! Cpt ricard (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done You have less than 50 edits in the past year, and only 537 edits in 6+ years. I really don't see a need for this right. INeverCry 18:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ninney

For betterment of Wikipedia articles. Ninney (talk) 11:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Your request does not show an understanding of what this user right is. If you don't know what it is you probably don't need it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I have few Indian articles on my watchlist like 2013 Indian Premier League Which is under pending changes (PC) protection. It is also a current event & many pending edits are awaiting to be reviewed. To protect such articles against BLP, vandalism; I need the Reviewer Rights. Thanks ! - Ninney (talk) 03:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:2001:db8

I've worked on numerous breaking-news articles, and particularly given the current PC2 RFC, I'd like to make sure that experienced editors can receive reviewer permissions without undue effort, to be able to voice my opinion on that proposal since my particular interest in that RFC is as it applies to high-traffic articles. (I'd also simply like to be able to review and accept changes on any article, of course; I believe I've demonstrated an ability to discern such and deal with vandalism appropriately.) – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 03:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 17:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Martin451

I have a good history on Wikipedia, and have had the rollback right for a long time which I used to deal with vandalism, but have not been as prolific lately. Reviewer needs a similar amount of trust as rollback. I have some pages on my watchlist with pc1 on them, and I understand wikipedia policy enough to make decisions on them, but cannot without the right. With the current discussion it looks like pc2 will be implemented, and I believe I have the level of trust needed to use this Martin451 (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 17:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:WorldTraveller101

I work hard to make Wikipedia as accurate and reliable as possible. I also help with checking to make sure all is accurate and will also revert vandalism and unconstructive and having reviewer will allow me to help out more in the process of pending changes, so I can more quickly check that information going in to an article is as accurate, verifiable, and policy-matching as possible. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 23:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chris troutman

I've just completed the Counter-vandalism course and already have rollback rights as a campus ambassador. I'm asking for Reviewer permission to balance out the workload I create as I've requested "pending changes" for articles like James Monroe. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I also gave you the rollback right explicitly. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer&oldid=556550447"