Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Marcnut1996 (talk | contribs) at 06:03, 8 June 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer

(add requestview requests)


User:Banej

I routinely edit and have a reasonable editing history. I'm aware of the policy on vandalism and familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I am also familiar with the basic legal policy of Wikipedia:Copyrights. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ (Talk) 10:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 20:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oliverlyc

I patrol for vandalism, and as such is very familiar with Wikipedia's vandalism policies. I must admit there have been a few hiccups along the way, but I always strive towards fixing them along the way. I already have rollback rights. :) ★ Oliverlyc ★ ✈✈✈ Pop me a message! 09:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 20:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ken Seh

The reason I want to be a reviewer is because I want to help promote articles to the Good or Featured article status. I also understand the criteria of being a reviewer. Please answer as soon as possible. Thank You! Ken Seh 20:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 345 edits doesn't show enough experience to judge your suitability for having this right. Also, the reviewer right isn't connected to GA/FA. See Wikipedia:Reviewing. INeverCry 20:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Double sharp

Was previously one under my old User:Lanthanum-138 account in the trial in 2011; now that PC is back, it would be useful to have the right again to better monitor articles. Understand the relevant policies. Double sharp (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 20:58, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mrfrobinson

Would like to expand some of the work I do at WP:AfC into the established main space. I have a good history of non-problematic editing and a willingness to help! Mike (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) The reviewer flag has got nothing to do with WP:AFC. This permission you are asking for by no means helps one review AfC submissions; this permission only allows you to review pending changes on PC-protected pages. smtchahaltalk 04:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Archcaster

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Archcaster (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to become a reviewer because I want to review things that are acceptable to protected articles, not like vandalism or other inapporiate requested edits that users make.

 Not done A review of your editing history and participation in discussions gives me strong reason to believe that you need more experience and a greater understanding of policies, especially vandalism. Give it time, do some pure vandalism reverting, and then apply again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Surfer43

I would like to help review pages on Wikipedia. I am familiar with the basic content policies, legal policies, and the guidline on reviewing. I have access to STiki and have used it over 650 times. Surfer43 (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marcnut1996

I dislike vandalism across Wikipedia and I will revert vandalism if I ever see them, in addition to Wikipedia's vandalism policies. Also, I constantly add citations because I know uncited content will be removed. I know uncited contents are removed because there is no evidence to back it up. Marcnut1996 (talk) 06:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]