User talk:EncMstr

My admin actions
Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions
Admin links
Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR
Backlog • Prod • AfD • Autoblocks
Arbitration
Arbitration • Noticeboard • Enforcement
Checkuser
RFCU • Clerks page • Checkuser
Abusive Hosts • VCN proxycheck • ippages
Multi-RBL lookup • DNSstuff
• Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index

Archives

through March 2007 • March 2007 through March 2008 • March 2008 through July 2008 • July 2008 through March 2009 • March 2009 through January 2011 • January 2011 through present

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account where I changed my password!

Standard diving dress

Any particular reason for your revert? I'm not seeing the problem here. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right: I didn't notice there were consecutive edits, all but the last seemed valid. I think I corrected it? Does the IP's last edit seem spammy to you as well? —EncMstr (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'd agree with that.

The course details might be un-spammmy if it added anything to the article. With a bit of detail, even possibly just a URL, it might be a really good addition. As it is though it's just a content-free namecheck and that's definitely not what we want. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For the hard work that it must have taken to prepare List of waterfalls in Oregon from scratch last year, and for working on other Oregon-related lists. Jsayre64 (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Hogan reversion

Sorry I didn't explain on the article but the information I deleted was duplicated. Star Child and Martian Knightlife aren't really novels (Star Child collects four linked short stories while Martian Knightlife collects two novellas with the same lead character) so in an earlier edit I put them in the collections section along with contents information. Would it be OK to restore my edit?--Wyvern Rex. (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I didn't look at the overall context—only that there was valid material removed without any explanation. Please use the edit summary to avoid misunderstandings. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 10:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a question relating to JPH. Apparently, in 2010-11 there was supposed to be a final collection of his coming out with Hadley Rille publishers but there's no word on its release. Here's what I know:

There were supposed to be five reprints. The titles were not disclosed but "The Colonising of Tharle", "Jailhouse Rock", "Murphy's War", "Escape" and the expanded version of "Leapfrog" hadn't been collected elsewhere.
In addition, five new stories were planned. No details have been disclosed.
No "non-fiction" articles were mentioned.

Do you know anything else about this?--Wyvern Rex. (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion assistance

Done —EncMstr (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]

It's not urgent, but could you help me by either deleting, or advising me how best to propose deleting, the following article? – RiverPlace (MAX station). I only recently discovered that this article exists, even though it was created in 2006 (!), in relation to a light rail line that did not even begin to be under construction until 2011 and is not due to open until 2015. It's a completely unreferenced, four-sentence stub, and renaming it doesn't make sense, because TriMet no longer has any plans for a RiverPlace station on the Milwaukie MAX line. This stub never should been created (at such an early stage in the planning for the MAX line) in the first place, and I see no reason to keep the "article" on Wikipedia, but I cannot find an appropriate criterion at WP:CSD for a speedy deletion. Must this case really go through a deletion discussion? (You can answer on this page, which I'll watchlist.) SJ Morg (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUTURE is the applicable reason, but for CSD, it is probably best captured in CSD#A7: No indication of importance. I have deleted it on that basis. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I considered tagging it with CSD#A7, but I wasn't sure, since A7 lists specific (but broad) subject areas, and this subject – a proposed structure – did not appear to fit under any of them. However, I figured A7 is probably intended to cover such cases, and your application of it supports that notion. Thanks again. SJ Morg (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, EncMstr. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 02:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Templates?

Hi EncMstr, I just got a weird message from you and I think you have the wrong guy