Talk:Type certificate

Aviation Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Initial article based on knowledge and experience.Fikri

I'm removing the sentence about 'ETOPS may require testing in remote areas' - as far as I know, ETOPS operations are permitted based on meeting training, equipment and reliability standards, and no ETOPS testing is conducted. Cerireid (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other certification agencies

• • • • • • • • • • •
Aviaregister of the Interstate Aviation Committee (AR MAK) www.mak.ru (former Aviaregister of the USSR)
State Department of Aviation Transport of Ukraine (Ukraviatrans) www.ukraviatrans.gov.ua
Aviaregister of the Ministry of Civil Aviation of People's Republic of China (CAAC-AAD) www.gov.cn

There are other. I think they are notable enough, huh? --Yuriy Lapitskiy ~ 14:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STC

Why was the STC redirected to here? Doesn't seem like wiki would want both discussed in same2busy2chat (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)2busy2chat[reply]

Bad grammar

The second sentence makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.246.1.87 (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Airworthiness Certificate

The article included a reference to another WP article entitled, Standard Airworthiness Certificate". The definition for the latter may not be applicable in the US, refers to "states" which appears to be a reference to "Nation State", not to the meaning it has in the US. Refering to it, didn't seem necessary after making changes so I removed the reference. Kernel.package (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs after #2

These paragraphs should be moved to another article. The processes followed in the US is essentially the same as in other countries. The prevailing legislative and enforcement bodies may differ. Another factor to consider is that only military in the U.S. is subject to different standards than non-mil. Also, NASA is subject to these same rules, as are Telecommunications satellites. That is: They apply to everything that's in the air, and that we hope either stays in the air or falls to the ground in a predictable way. Kernel.package (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]