Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiallia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ConanFan (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 6 October 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shiallia

Shiallia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Forgotten Realms through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect and protect- this article was previously redirected merged to List of Forgotten Realms deities as a result of consensus at a community discussion. It was undone by an IP editor without a word, as part of a reversion spree. It should be put back the way it was and protected to avoid redirection again being undone on the sly. Reyk YO! 05:28, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and Redirect List of Forgotten Realms deities. The info is verifiable in authoritative sources and the topic is a reasonable search term. Per WP:PRESERVE, merging of verifiable topics is preferable to deletion and WP:ATD-M seems to apply here, Pages about non-notable fictional elements are generally merged into list articles or articles covering the work of fiction in which they appear. --Mark viking (talk) 05:50, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect and protect per Reyk. Other articles which were part of the same consensus and restored by the same IP should also be protected.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • the multiple restorations by IPs are troubling. the other articles improperly recreated by the IP also need to be converted back to redirects and locked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge per BOZ. Hihidufgh (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]