User talk:GB fan

User page Talk Links Sandbox Dashboard

This user is the owner of one other Wikipedia account in a manner permitted by policy and it is registered with the arbitration committee.

Please note: If your message is related to a disputed edit, the best thing to do is open a discussion on the talkpage of the article instead of leaving a message here. This way we may involve as many editors as possible instead of confining the discussion here. Wikipedia is a community effort. Let's use this community component. Thank you.

Thank you

Your User ID are the initials of my Father who was English. :) Thank you so very kindly for reviewing my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Library777 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

You are wlcome. GB fan 16:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the declined speedy deletion

WP:G7 actually states the following: "(For redirects created as a result of a pagemove, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages prior to the move.)" Therefore, your reasoning for declining was invalid, and I ask that you reconsider. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

you are correct, I didn't look at the target article close enough. GB fan 18:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Poshitis

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Poshitis, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, please to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if you feel it should be deleted. Nsaa (talk) 15:16, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Nsaa (talk) 15:16, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Much improved since I tagged it. GB fan 14:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Wild

Boy, he really went bananas. Thanks for cleaning it all up.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

yw, it is hard to believe that he was that upset about the article being deleted. GB fan 14:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Some speedies

like Kath Eats Real Food should probably be marked as G11 as well as G7 (and might turn out to be G12 also, ) For articles that assert something , but not anything that is really important, I usually think it best to give all applicable reasons. Saves a lot of arguments, and discourages re-creation of what's inevitably going to be hopeless. DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I agree that speedies when applicable should be marked with all criteria that apply. In that case I did not think that the article was "exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." A lot of times it is subjective if the article meets certain criteria. In this case you obviously thought it met the G11 criteria and I didn't think it met the criteria. When I nominate or delete articles under the speedy deletion criterion, I mark/delete them with the ones I believe they meet. GB fan 14:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Please put the page back

Hello, I am conducting a wikithon right now and that is a page that we will be filling in. Please put it back up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omahlerhaug (talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

asdified deletion????????????????????????

HI, THIS IS ASDIFIED! I JUST SAW THAT MY USER PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED BY YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YES!!!!! i am mad!!!!!!!!!!!! IF YOU SAW THAT THAT KILLING YOUR FAMILY THING WAS A JOKE THEN WHY DID YOU DELETE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????????????????????????????? pLZ REPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:( Asdified (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

apologies

i'm sorry for leaving you a kick-ass message on your talk page earlier. i was just wondering if i could recreate my talk page again. plz reply Asdified (talk) 23:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)