Talk:Eastrans

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Eastrans is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Buses

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles

Route table

Cited route table reinstated. WP:NOTDIR does not prohibit, if to be deleted WP:consensus required. User 202.146.15.12 (talk) 19:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bus routes fail WP:NOTTRAVEL WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDIR, You can WP:PROSE them tho if you want.... →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of WP:NOTTRAVEL WP:NOTGUIDE or WP:NOTDIR cover it either. If it were a timetable it would be covered, but a table listing the routes operated, that changes at best once every few years, is noteworthy. The advantage of a table over WP:PROSE, is that it is easier to read.

A WP:consensus needs to be gained, rather than resorting to threatening editors who disagree with being blocked. User 202.146.15.12 (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was gained in previous "Bus routes" deletions months ago, Blocks are last resort IMO.... Anyway I think meeting you half way with prosing is the best solution here :)

Thanks -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can a link be provided? User 202.146.15.12 (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]