Jump to content

User talk:Toddst1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shoka1234 (talk | contribs) at 06:07, 21 November 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.




Peruvian IP hopper

He won't let up. Maybe consider protecting the page indefinitely, or at least until this most recent rush of disruption subsides. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 16:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

old schoolblock causing problem at 66.94.192.6

I recently noticed 66.94.192.6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which had a {{schoolip}} and {{schoolblock}} on the talkpage. A whois check listed it as belonging to an office address for Family Video. I changed the first to {{Shared IP corp}}, but your block notice still has it showing erroneously at Category:Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. Could you either change your notice to {{anonblock}} or remove it entirely? Thanks.--Auric talk 21:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done so. I'm not sure what the info I had when I tagged the IP as such, but Family video is the ISP and behaviorally it sure does quack like bored schoolkids. Toddst1 (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My guess would be kids using a parent's office connection, but thanks.--Auric talk 22:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And since it looks like the petty vandalism is continuing, I've re-blocked the account. Toddst1 (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Retention

Hi Todd, I wanted to let you know that the block of User:Indigo Tourism is being discussed at Editor Retention, and ask if you might wish to join the conversation. - Khazar2 (talk) 10:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would like you to reconsider, and lift, the ban on User:Indigo Tourism. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indigo Tourism (talk · contribs) is not banned. S/he may request unblocking, which I (or any other admin) would almost certainly grant if s/he indicated that the account was to be renamed and used within our policies. However, I have no indication that Indigo Shire's Tourism department has any interest in editing anything on Wikipedia besides promoting tourism to their area. Toddst1 (talk) 12:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Todd

I apparently vandalized wikipedia by pointing out a fact that to my knowledge was completely accurate, I'll be sure to cite my sources next time. Sorry again and maybe we can ball sometime. =)

Why is this page "pending changes" and indef. semi-protected at the same time? --George Ho (talk) 23:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A longer block?

Hey Toddst1, I was thinking that User: Shoka1234 deserves a longer block due to this comment, the user was blocked for personal attacks and harassment before, and frankly the user frequently violates WP:V and probably deserved a longer block then 12 hours from the beginning. Telling two editors to quote, "kill themselves" seems like it definitely jumps a boundary to me. STATic message me! 04:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lol you nerdy little dips hits are just mad because you know i'm right. It was certified 2 days ago but now you're butthurt because you see that i was right. And I won't get unblocked because all the admins suck each other off.