User talk:Ronnie42

Welcome!

Hello, Ronnie42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
Also, thank you for your work on the Super transformation‎ article, though the article is ment for information on the Video Games use of super transformation‎, and not for the comic books, I can understand your cunfusion and frustration at the removal of your work (I've lost count of the amount of time it's happened to me), but I hope this will not make you bitter toward wikipedia and you will continue to add to the many articles that there are!

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Doktor Wilhelm 14:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Ronnie42 (talk) 03:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)== Wiki is a place for facts, not opinions == If anyone has a problem with me stating facts then try to turn into a forum. I state facts, back them up. If anyone can't source their information then it shouldn't be posted.[reply]

when editing talk pages

Please put your signature at the end of your post not the beginning. Thanks. Dbrodbeck (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has been a frequent thing for a while now.--Ronnie42 (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "List of zombie films". Thank you. --Williamsburgland (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on talk pages

Hey friend... I just wanted to stop by and share a concern... it seems you're using talk pages, both those of articles as well as other users as discussion forums outside of the context of editing Wikipedia. That is not its intended use and could eventually result in administrative action. I certainly don't think it will come to that, and if it helps I could suggest a variety of general interest forums that might be of interest to you. Also, one other thing I wanted to bring up - I heard you got your sister pregnant. Is that true? If so it may be in violation of Wikipedia bylaws, and would need to be investigated by the proglamation commitentcy. Please let me know so I can prepare the necessary paperwork either way. --Swankytank (talk) 01:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your sick, should be reported! --Ronnie42 (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What? Look, I'm really sorry if I did something to make you feel bad. Let me know what it is and I'll do my best to make it right. Now, that said, you really hurt my feelings by calling me a sick person and a troll. I've now apologized to you for whatever I did to make you sad, so I think it's only right that you do the same for me.

Thanks in advance!--Swankytank (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

Hi, I'm Carrie. I noticed you posted on WP:DRN. I'm just letting you know that I've deleted your comments, because

It was posted in the middle of an unrelated dispute. To request dispute resolution, you should click 'request dispute resolution' to start a new thread. However,
This appears to be a conduct dispute. The DRN is for resolving content disputes, so your request would have been declined anyway. WP:Requests for comment/User conduct might be a more suitable place to ask for help.

CarrieVS (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least post this required thread to the right place? I find this confusing. --Ronnie42 (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The right place would probably be the page WP:Requests for comment/User conduct - I have no more knowledge of it than you; I only know of this page because it was suggested in the 'guide for participants' on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard - the page you tried to post it on. Looking at it, the first two sections are 'how to proceed' and 'instructions', so it shouldn't be too hard to work out.

As far as the DRN goes, you would need to click the button 'request dispute resolution' underneath the 'guide for participants'. This opens a page with instructions, and following them will create a section for your dispute like the others on the page.

However, please do not do that! If you had filed a request this way, I or another volunteer would have closed it immediately and directed you to the same page I have, because we only deal with content disputes at the DRN, not conduct. CarrieVS (talk) 10:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hello, I'm Swankytank. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please do not name call or use phrases like "troll" to refer to other editors. Furthermore, please post messages on talk pages, not user pages. Finally, making legal threats is strictly against Wikipedia policy, and will lead to a ban until you have resolved your legal action. --Swankytank (talk) 15:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no excuse for your direct attacks at me, talk/user pages has nothing to do with your personal attacks on family which is sick, twisted!, half of what you say is lies to cover your own ass! Reported --Ronnie42 (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for user conduct assistance

Hi Ronald - my name is Bryce (Paul is my brother, and we're always joking about who is the stronger one). I saw the noticeboard issue and I'm hoping to help. I see that Sankytank apologized -- Ronald, if that's good enough for you why don't you go ahead return the gesture. If not, let's have ourselves a fireside so we can get to the bottom of this.

Ronald - you can start by explaining the crux of your issue. --Stronger Than Paul (talk) 02:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saying what he said was an unprovoked attack, 2ndly this account could have easily been duplicated to create similar attacks to troll. A few pretend words of an apology is not enough, I want/demand something be done about it. --Ronnie42 (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ronald - I see that another user has brought about a conclusion to the issue you've had with that other user. Forgive me for missing the comment he made; as you said the attack was hidden in a seemingly normal remark, and I guess I missed that. I also just wanted to remind you that I'm pretty new here, and I think I told you that to begin with, though my edits go back to December 26 (the account was a Christmas present from my brother Paul). In fact, I'm pretty sure I forgot to log in for some of my edits, because I most certainly made more than are showing up in my count. Anyway, inferring that I might be a Sockpuppet is hurtful, particularly because I was trying to help you. Please keep that in mind in the future. --Stronger Than Paul (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, what a misunderstanding we've had. I just reread my original note to you and realized I've made a huge error. You see, I was doing some multitasking while I was posting my helpful and friendly note to you, and trying to text my mate Lucas at the same time. See, Lucas is a good chap, but I heard a rumor that he accidently got his sister pregnant. I must have accidently asked you that... what a mix up! No wonder old Luke was asking what Wikipedia is (he's a bit of a dunce). Gee whiz any way, this was quite a misunderstanding!

Now, onto apologies. As you know, I've already apologized in advance. I also made a minor improvement to your comment on my talk page to make it friendlier. With that in mind I think it makes sense for you to apologize twice and thank me three times. Let me know what you think. --Swankytank (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't rise to it. CarrieVS (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simplier solution ban this User:Swankytank --Ronnie42 (talk) 16:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie- I explained what happened! Why isn't that good enough for you???--Swankytank (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just like to say thanks for the action taken against the accounts mentioned here. --Ronnie42 (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Autism. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was no 'Vandalism', all was that was done was added a reply to the 'talk' board, the main page for Autism is using false information to discriminate/provoke attack Autism. --Ronnie42 (talk) 11:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTCENSORED and stop removing other editors' comments because they offend you. You have been warned repeatedly about related problems and are very close to being blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 12:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Been talking to the other administration's, there seems to be a misunderstanding, I didn't intentionally remove other peoples comments, that for reasons unknown to me that mass's about comments were being removed. You could have mentioned it this but instead it was poorly done. This is what they said here. --Ronnie42 (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]