User talk:Jingiby

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihajlo Apostolski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gevgelija may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Gevgelija''' ({{lang-mk|Гевгелија}} ;{{IPA-mk|ɡɛvˈɡɛlija||Mk-Gevgelija.ogg}} is a town with a population of 15,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Bulgarian

The UCLA data is from the 1980s, and the BBC uses the same number (god knows where they got it from), while Ethnologue is from the 2011 census (though their Ukrainian data is undated). — kwami (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The UCLA cites 1999 data. Jingiby (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Demacedonization

I noticed your edit diff aimed to equate Macedonian identity with regional identity. No doubt you know that Macedonian ethnic identity emerged in 19th century. Unless you are able to provide RS for each individual people please don't attribute them regional identity based on general observation of authors from Bulgaria.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not use unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography. Do revert reliably sourced clarifying content. Discuss on talk. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 13:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

With this comment (diffs) you accused me for "biased edits and POV-pushing". Will you please be so kind to present diffs that justify your accusation?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography

With this edit (diff) you labeled the source I used as "unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography" and insisted that I should "discuss on talk". You tagbombed the article I just created tagging "unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography" of Aaron Assa as unreliable. But when I followed your request and used talkpage to discuss this issue you refused to reply to my question about the source I used although I asked you two times about "Yugoslav communist historiography" of Aaron Assa (diff1 and diff2) and replied with "full stop for now" (diff).

I expect you to either prove that work of Aaron Assa is "unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography" or to apologize for your actions and revert your tagging.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Assa was an communist partisan during WWII, who later moved to Israel. He published his book at first in 1972 in Tel Aviv. Parts from it were crticized by the Macedonian Patriotic Organization as biased publication afterwards in their magazine Macedonian Tribune. Check here, please. Also read a critical view to its interpretation by the post-communist Macedonian historiography in Bringing the Dark Past to Light: The Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe, John-Paul Himka, Joanna Beata Michlic, University of Nebraska Press, 2013, ISBN 0803246471, pp. 359-360. Jingiby (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

When I saw you added some link I hoped I was wrong and reverted myself. Unfortunately, you failed to prove that work of Aaron Assa is "unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography". One text published by Вида Боева Попова that criticizes Assa for not emphasizing that Macedonians are Bulgarians (пропуска да отбележи, че тия „дейни членове на македонското движение“ бяха българи) speaks for itself. Pointing to Macedonian Patriotic Organization that promotes the view that ethnic Macedonians are Bulgarians additionally shows the weakness of your arguments.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Assa himself was an communist activist, and his interpretation of the historical events is nonproffessional and biased. I do not say Boeva is objective, she is also biased from another angle. Jingiby (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

You failed to prove that work of Bulgarian author Aaron Assa is "unreliable, biased sources from Yugoslav Communist historiography". Communist ≠ nonproffessional and biased by definition. You have very pragmatic approach to communist era historical works. When they support Bulgarian identity of some Macedonian (diff) you don't mind if a source is published in communist era Bulgaria. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Moshe Kamhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferdinand I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

I have engaged in Edit war and for Good Reason

Hi. It has been said so many times that images of Prophet Mohammed (SAS) and other Prophets as a matter of fact is a false testament in a way to what they looked like. No one knows in this current situation what they looked like. So posting Their images is a serious offence against Islam.

You say you don't censor content. Tell me how come is this censorship. You are allowing wrong information to be imprinted on the website and you say you don't censor content. Freedom is everyone's right and should be performed in a rightful way without hurting one's sentiments.

I request Wikipedia again to remove alleged images of Prophets from articles they are present in. This is a serious offence against Islam and Allah doesn't like it. This is totally wrong to our beliefs.

I am not an enemy. Just trying to protect my religion from such acts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferraribauer (talk • contribs) 10:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I understand you, however Wikipedia is not a religious website and it does not respect the Islamic dogmas, i.e. images of Prophet Mohammed are accepted here as some kind of information about the founder of the Islam, not as a brake of its rules. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 10:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Jingiby, thanks for reaching out. It is said that Wikipedia is for gaining Knowledge. What good is Knowledge if it's false? Posting blasphemous images in this context is like providing a graphical representation of what had happened. Isn't this wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferraribauer (talk • contribs) 11:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Boyko Borisov

Hello. I write to you because of the changes you made with the information I shared. It provides the viewers with wider information which for sure helps him or her in getting acquainted with the personality of Boyko Borisov. And this is the reason I applied the information. Thank you. 16:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nneeppttuunn (talk • contribs)

Politicalexpert (talk) 08:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Hi. I really think that you made a mistake, when you delete all my edits, because I use absolutely new source of information and this is the official site of Boyko Borissov, whose actually real name is with double S, which is wrong here. You can see all the information I added here I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.Thank you very much

Hi. Please avoid self-published sources per WP:BLPSPS. Never use self-published sources – including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets – as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject. Using the subject as a self-published source per WP:BLPSELFPUB. Living persons may publish material about themselves, such as through press releases or personal websites. Such material may be used as a source only if: it is not unduly self-serving; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources. Jingiby (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I put a detailed biography from his personal site which can be find everywhere but not here and also a lot of new information from different sources which you delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Politicalexpert (talk • contribs) 10:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Facts

and historical documents of serbian Macedonia you are calling forum? ha...My dear you should learn something! Stop delete that document because truth is thing by which we calling ourselves human.--Boris Godunov (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Please, keep in mind, I have removed a lot of outdated sources from the talk page of the article Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonoia because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal and finally Wikipedia is not a forum. Check What Wikipedia is not. Check also Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. The "Talk" page on Wikipedia is associated with each article and helps coordinate work among multiple editors. Also editors may use the "Talk" page to reach consensus. I did not see some kind of that ideas by your pushing of outdated, biased info there. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

If it is valid documents with references, then you dont think that is useful for someone who wants to give more for this article? Based on what?--Boris Godunov (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonia (theme), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)