Jump to content

Talk:Sal Khan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.11.193.82 (talk) at 01:35, 27 February 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconEducation Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

There is no such thing as Nationality: "American". American means all of North to South America, i.e. from Canada to Argentina. His nationality is "United States of America" or USA. And He is a Muslim. He is Bangladesh and Indian descendant. Just like President Obama is Kenya and USA descendant, but with nationality of United States of America. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.199.250 (talk) 16:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think such merge would be unnecessary. For example, Apple has it's page but so does Steve Jobs and so on. Moreover, the Khan Academy is almost entirely his own production and if anything, it should be merged into this article. Please reconsider.QEDtheory (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are notable for more than what they did with Apple and Microsoft whereas Mr. Khan is not notable for anything beyond the Khan Academy. The Khan Academy is not notable because Sal Khan founded it. Sal Khan is notable because he founded the Khan Academy. I think a merge of Sal Khan into Khan Academy would be a logical move. HankyUSA (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Come on! The man who provided over a thousand videos and donated years to further education does not deserve his own page? Yet we give porn stars their own pages? HankyUSA, go find something else to do please. 137.30.122.155 (talk) 00:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Salman Khan is great. I aspired to be like him before I even knew of him, but that makes no difference. Wikipedia articles aren't medals of honor. Their encyclopedic articles. Sal isn't notable for anything outside of the Khan Academy (unlike Steve Jobs with Apple and Bill Gates with Microsoft). Once he becomes notable for something independent of the Khan Academy, then we should make a article specifically for him. For now I think it would be best to expand his bio section on the Khan Academy article and delete this article; in other words, merge this article into that one. HankyUSA (talk) 05:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HankyUSA, with respect, your idea was reasonable in February, stubborn in May, and by late November, dated and unreasonable. Audrey Hepburn was not the same actor after Roman Holiday came out, and Salman Kahn is not the same media figure he was ten months ago. A cult of personality has begun. Steve Jobs's death, and the lament following, have sent us looking for heroic replacements. Kahn has been elected, whether he likes it or not. Prof. George Leonard, San Francisco State UniversityProfhum (talk) 10:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under American Muslim Category?

I don't see how Salman is classified as an "American Muslim" at the bottom of the article. He has repeatedly chosen to not reveal his religion. Just because of his name, we cannot assume he is a Muslim.JDONT (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, his own website at khanacademy.org (under frequently asked questions), says "If you believe in trying to make the best of the finite number of years we have on this planet (while not making it any worse for anyone else), think that pride and self-righteousness are the cause of most conflict and negativity, and are humbled by the vastness and mystery of the Universe, then I'm the same religion as you." I am not sure that means that he wants to be classified as a Muslim. Adityan (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


-- Sal Khan is definitely not a Muslim (there is one famous person with the same name who is a Muslim) -- So don't confuse the two! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DoryT (talk • contribs) 10:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To play devil's advocate: just because he doesn't talk about his religion, it doesn't mean he's not religious. He may well be a practising Muslim. Calling him non-Muslim is disingenuous. Weirdly and funnily enough, I think people here have an agenda: they want him to be non-Muslim. Consider other hobbies, please. 5.245.168.133 (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity- South Asian

At the very least Salman Khan is South Asian. Most specifically he is probably Indian. Even though in all of his interviews he mentions the birthplace of his mother and father it is clear he was raised by a single mother and she is of Indian descent:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/05/technology/khan-academy-blends-its-youtube-approach-with-classrooms.html?hpw&gwh=C42FBFDDE6E89644955C4065CD9C24E4

Please refrain from mentioning Salman Khan as Bangladeshi or Pakistani. If you have insecurity issues and want to proudly state his origins then simply say he is South Asian. It seems like people are adamant about him being Bangladeshi because every time I change his ethnicity to South Asian someone changes it.

If you read the above nytimes article you will find out that he was raised by his mother alone. She is Indian. Fin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.252.201 (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In his own words

Malaiya (talk) 20:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani American?

His says on his FAQ page that his mother is Indian and his father Bangladeshi. How does this make him Pakistani? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.18.110 (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The claim of Pakistani ethnicity is false. According to both Khan's website and the Fortune article, Khan's father is of Bangladeshi descent. --Ragib (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
his father migrated from East Pakistan now known as Bangladesh i agree but at that time bangladesh was the part of Pakistan or known as East Pakistan, so please note that and thats why he is the part of Organization of Pakistani Entrepreneurs of North America.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sch2020 (talk • contribs)
At one time, my father and mother were in East Pakistan, and my grandfather was in British India, and many generations ago, was part of Mughal empire. If you go way back, probably some of my ancestors came from Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago. That does not make myself Indian or Pakistani or African. :D
As for Salman Khan speaking at some conference, oh please!! Let me show who else also spoke in the conference: Tom Campbell, Former Dean Haas School of Business; six-term Congressman; Economist. And would you claim Congressman Campbell to be Pakistani as well, just because he spoke at that conference? LOL. --Ragib (talk) 00:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to show this argument :-D -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 18:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the benefit of the anon IPs from Pakistan, and the Single-purpose accounts that use them, I'm quoting Khan himself on his ethnic and national origin: (from Khan's own website [1]):


So, I request the anon IPs and the single purpose accounts to stop inserting false information. Khan's membership in organizations does not matter, since he himself states (and also reiterated in the Fortune article) that his father is from Barisal, Bangladesh. --Ragib (talk) 00:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is clearly a Bangladeshi American. Bangladeshi by birth, American by birth place. --Rossi101 (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Rossi101[reply]

Islamic Bangladesh used to be East Pakistan, but today only non-ethnic Bengali's from that region declare themselves as Pakistanis. The Bengladeshis hated Pakistan's rules, and thus choose not to affiliate with Pakistan, it could be said with this guy whom may be a Bengali Patriot. --75.159.2.59 (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why he is Bangladeshi American. Why is he not Indian American? Are you guys sexist or misogynistic? Note when asked what his origin/ethnicity is he neither states he is indian american nor bangladeshi. Why not call him South Asian instead? Calling him Bangladeshi implies he is of Bengali descent only and this is entirely false! Please reflect this appropriately since he neither identifies with Islam or Hinduism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.252.201 (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If his background was from one place or ethnicity then he could be considered "Blah Blah-American" (as in Italian-American or Irish-American or whatever). If the person has a mixed background then they are simply an American. It is as simple as that. 108.202.113.201 (talk) 00:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Birth??

can anyone update his date of birth..regards--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Salman Khan (educator)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Salman Khan (educator)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "fortune":

  • From Charlie Rose: Kaplan, David A. (September 28, 2009). "Why business loves Charlie Rose". Fortune. Retrieved December 18, 2009.
  • From Khan Academy: "Innovation in Education: Bill Gates' favorite teacher". CNN Money. 24 August 2010. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Primary topic for "Salman Khan"

Shouldn't this be the primary topic for the value "Salman Khan"? (According to Wikipedia's unclear guidelines regarding primary topics.) 46.120.188.111 (talk) 21:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Personal Life

This section should either me revised to feature information about Khan or have its title changed to Khan's wife.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sal_Khan&oldid=597309790"