Talk:Sternum
Appearance
![]() | Anatomy: Gross C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Picture
This picture could really use a redo. Looks pretty bad!
--2001:558:6014:3B:204F:657:CF1F:F22A (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Human sternum
There is no reason to have two separate articles, information on the animal sternum can be provided in a subsection on the larger article focusing on the human sternum. It is needlessly fragmented to have one stub and a second 'human sternum' article. LT910001 (talk) 01:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Manubrium
Needless fragmentation of content; makes articles harder to reader for readers, could easily be provided on the main Sternum article, this could be expanded at a later time if need be. LT910001 (talk) 06:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Should Sternal angle be considered for merger, as well? Novangelis (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)