User talk:Kvng

Request for comment

Hello Kvng, I'm here onbehalf of WP:ORPHAN in which you are also a participant. So, we want your opinion to a WP:ORPHAN related matter. It is a proposal by Technical 13. Please have a look here. Your opinion (i.e support, oppose etc) are very much appreciated there. Thank you. By Jim Cartar through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Backlog drive

Hello Kvng,

WikiProject Orphanage is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive to de-orphan articles which have orphan tags!
The goal is to eliminate the backlog of orphan articles. There are currently 58326 articles which have orphan tags. The drive is running from April 12, 2014 to May 12, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all editors participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. To add your name in the participants list click here.
So start de-orphaning articles! Click here to see the list of articles need de-orphaning. Visit Suggestions for how to de-orphan an article to know more!

Thanks. _{Opt-out Instructions} by Jim Cartar on behalf of WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Circumcision

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Reinstate request

Is it possible to have my February 2014 article reinstated so that I can remove the copyrighted material? I really don't want to retype everything again. Thanks.21:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceedeeo (talk • contribs)

It is possible. We need the exact title of the article you're referring to and it would also help to have the user name of the administrator that deleted the page. I am not an administrator so could not have been the one who deleted the page. I am probably the one who marked it as a possible copyright violation. ~KvnG 23:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Accepting OSIP at AfC

Hi Kvng,

I have recently nominated OSIP, a page that you accepted in the AfC process, for deletion. It seems to me that this article was accepted without sufficient coverage in outside sources. If you disagree, please feel free to comment on OSIP's AfD entry.

Thanks,

TheCascadian 02:43, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

AFC pages you have under review

You have one or more pages in Category:Pending AfC submissions being reviewed now with your name on them. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Concrete Group AB

Hi, some time ago I sent you few comments about your decision not to publish the article about Thomas Concrete Group, but I havent received any answer from you. Could you please let me know how can we proceed with the article? All best, Kasia Gorzowianka (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

@Gorzowianka:, I answered with another question [[1]]. I have found the submission now. To answer your question, the citations we're looking for at this point are any that can establish notability of the topic. First find the references and then we can figure out where to put them. Keep in mind that not all topics are worthy of coverage on Wikipedia. ~KvnG 01:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of programs that open TS files

The article List of programs that open TS files has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards for stand-alone lists. We already have Comparison of video player software which includes breakdown by format.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Barnstar for de-orphaning articles
	Thank you for your efforts to de-orphan articles, Although we are unsuccessful to make a dent on the huge backlog, but your efforts to de-orphan articles are very much appreciated. Happy editing! -- From: Jim Carter onbehalf of WikiProject Orphanage through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Reviewing some reverts

Hi, Thank you for reviewing my changes to linear systems https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_system&oldid=prev&diff=607022811 However I think the current version is really confusion. You reverted the changes based on the idea that I was introducing a different y(t). But that is not the case if you look at the two equations that use y_1 and y_2. If you think the linear spring as the linear system, then these y_1 and y_2 are the applied forcesand that was exactly the y(t) I introduced. Additionally the condition "Letting y(t) = 0" is completely unnecessary and indeed confusing... What is the output then? if it is supposed to be always 0? The spring viewed as a input out linear system int he way the example wants to show it is indeed a system that maps trajectories (inputs) into forces (outputs). In this sense I think my explanation is far more consistent that the current one. Can we have an explanation that rescue the best of both versions?

Thanks Kakila (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)