User talk:Nicholas Weiner
2014
I edited here on Wikipedia from 2006 to 2011. While I made some good edits, I will admit I fooled around on here a lot, tried to see if I could outsmart the system, and wasted people's time as a result of it. It was really just for a laugh; Wikipedia is a treasure trove of information on just about everything and I myself use it frequently as a very useful resource. To anyone that may one day read this, I have since gone sober, I'm rarely editing on Wikis anymore and I have overcome my urge to start trouble. I take full responsibility for my actions and apologize to all who I have wronged on here. Remember me for the contributions I did make, and whether or not I will seek to have this account re-instated, I will just say that I have moved on. -NW
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nufy8 23:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Diane Farrell deletion
You may have a point that the article should be deleted. However, procedurally, it needs to go through the AfD process for two reasons. First. there was enough debate and lack of consensus about the article's disposition before to warrant further discussion. Second, procedurally, and article cannot go through proposed deletion after it has been considered for any non-speedy deletion (a previous prod or AfD or its predecessors). Accordingly, I have deleted the prod tag. —C.Fred (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:DSC1079.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC1079.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Intelescope2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intelescope2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:DSC1080.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC1080.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Kittdown.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kittdown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Intelescope1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intelescope1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Intelescope1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Intelescope1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Intelescope2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Intelescope2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that I deleted your recent edit to this article for hte following reasons:
1. It is speculative. 2. It is a speculation that has, to my knowledge, no historic prescedence. 3. If there was presecedence, there was no third party citation to support that this might happen. 4. Your edit gave the appearance of being non-NPOV; which is to say in the absence of thiurd party verification, it was strictly a personal opinion.
While I for one hope that any guilty parties are found out, Wikipedia requires supporting citations before making these claims. If you find one, please re-add this information. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Rudy Giuliani
Please do not remove Rudy Giuliani from charts, templates or galleries and/or state that he has withdrawn because that has not yet happened. Thank you for your cooperation.--STX 04:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
New York
Perhaps you would like to state a source...? Hearing things on TV doesnt surfice as a reason to edit an article on Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Camaeron (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- From today until January 1, 2011; the office of Lieutenant Governor of New York is vacant. However, the Temporary President of the New York state Senate assumes the powers & duties of the Lt Gov as Acting Lieutenant Governor. GoodDay (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
what????
No way I spent time on that article why delete it if almost everything there is true. Just find sources I've already done my work and I mean the article seems notable enough to me.
--Nicholas Weiner (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've no idea what page you're talking about. Please see Wikipedia:Why was my article deleted? for an answer to your question. Stifle (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
you cheated
[1] Not that I mind, but it's cheating. 78.34.164.53 (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
FYI
For future reference, it is appreciated if you at least notify article creators when you tag something for AfD, because they may wish to explain their reasons for creating the article in the first place. Cheers. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 06:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Christmas Card
National Income Life Insurance Company
Please see its talk page. In a situation like this, if you have very good refs, then we'd add a section, not delete the article. But you will understand that there has to be excellent sourcing, not just personal experience, because the company is almost certain to strongly object. Some prior disputes of this sort have lasted for years and given us enormous trouble. So this needs to be followed up properly. I'll look there at the talk p. for your response. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:CII4.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)