User talk:Jersey92
The key to article inclusion is substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Has Joseph Steinberg been written about? The other issue is that you can't say stuff like he's an expert or he's credit with unless you have very strong sourcing to that effect. What you have are these type of assertions to his own articles. But that's not how things work here. We don't get to write our own bios. Know what I mean? I suspect that this subject does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion at this time. But if I can be of any assistance or you have questions I am happy to try to help. Vaya con Dios. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Candleabracadabra. Thanks for your help. Of course he has been written about. Usually in the context of his expertise. Google Joseph Steinberg cybersecurity and the like. You can see from the pages of his Forbes column how many people read and share what he writes. He's quoted all over the place and his work is also cited in patents. See the Google Scholar link on the page. I referenced some articles that reference him as an expert in response to your comment before. Do I need to put more? He's writing an advanced exam study textbook for the official certifying body of information security. They consider him an expert, as does Forbes, and all the people quoting him. Isn't that enough? Can you please point out what I should cut from the page if it sounds too much like an advertisement? Maybe take a stab at editing it? Also, I did not copy the bio he wrote.
--Jersey92 (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- No, I don't think it's enough. I don't see any articles about him or his work. As I said, the key is substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- I posted a reference to 1,000 sites that quoted him about a recent information security event (Heartbleed). That is the kind of substantial coverage that experts in his field get. General media quote him or ask for his expertise. I posted some links to clearly reliable independent sources in the references. Patents and journals discuss his work. Is that what you were looking for? (I posted the link to those on Google Scholar.) The organization that administers the certification exams in the field has him writing its textbook. Do you think I should make the whole article shorter and just concentrate on the outside coverage? He's best known for thought leadership with different takes on topics in his field (some of his articles have been controversial as a result). That's why people quote him all over the place. Should I refocus the article on his writing rather that his expertise? Thanks.
- No, I don't think it's enough. I don't see any articles about him or his work. As I said, the key is substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
--Jersey92 (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Asked around and got editing advice. Made a major edit.
--Jersey92 (talk) 17:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Joseph Steinberg was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The herald 12:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Steinberg
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Joseph Steinberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 17:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Nomination of Joseph Steinberg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Steinberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Steinberg (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
M. Caecilius (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Invite
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
As I found sources dated 5 months after the supposed cancellation that gave us information on casting and production, and while almost tempted to improve the darn thing and argue a keep under WP:NFF (paragraph 3, I do feel enough sources are available to justify it being written of somewhere within these pages even if not in its own article. I thus added a well-sourced short paragraph at Peter Hewitt (director)#Career, and ask that you support a redirect. Best regards, Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Jasmine Lawrence (May 29)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jasmine Lawrence.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.