User talk:68.50.21.190

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 68.50.21.190, is registered to Comcast, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

While you are an editor on wikipedia you are still human.

While you are an administrator on wikipedia you are still human.^{[citation needed]}

Please remember this.

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 18:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.50.21.190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What have I persistently vandalised? I read what jim said and restored the comment. Krazilec said I am allowed to keep this page as I wish so i wish for there to not be words from an editor who told me I cant speak English. Would you keep a leter that said 'bishonen you are stupid'?No you wouldnt so why should I? Psquare is being discussed and so I have not reverted it. i have commented on the talk page and the 3rr page.

Decline reason:

You made extensive changes to unrelated cases at AN3. This [1] is vandalism and this [2] is disruptive editing. Acroterion (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.50.21.190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

acroterion,once I was made aware I reverted. Look again.68.50.21.190 (talk) 19:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC) jim if you coudl say something I would appreciate it. When you told me I asked you ??? You explained and then I put back in the bs. That is evident in the page history. You even made a note on it. 68.50.21.190 (talk) 20:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per the SPI (and an incomprehensible unblock request). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note. I only kept it down to two weeks because 68.50.21.190 is supposed to be dynamic. But I guess, in view of the contribs history and previous blocks, it's not that dynamic. I've upped the block to a month, in view of this SPI and User:Bbb23's comment here. Bishonen | talk 20:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The block for a month is wrong. Why are you punishing me for others? SPI is not right.68.50.21.190 (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie, What do you mean per SPI ? If that person is doing wrong block them. I wrote to acroterion thinking acroterion would answer. If you look acroterion says I vandalised. I was not aware. When him told me I went and reverted to put back in the crap. That is why I said "jim could you say something...". Do you all look at the page history ? 68.50.21.190 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

68.50.21.190 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

acroterion, once I was made aware (jim told me) I reverted and put the bs back in. That revert is what you are 'calling vandalism and disruptive editing ' to an3. The 'extensive changes' were by accident, it was not intentional to remove the next an. I was putting back in the bs jim told me to. Look at the edit history.
Jim, could you say something. When you told me I asked you ???. You explained [3] and then I put back [4] in the bs. The next an3 section being removed was removed unintentionally. I am never allowed to finish my edits before kirin or bill isreverting so I didnt get the chance to re add the next an3. You did. 68.50.21.190 (talk) 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=acroterion, once I was made aware (jim told me) I reverted and put the bs back in. That revert is what you are 'calling vandalism and disruptive editing ' to an3. The 'extensive changes' were by accident, it was not intentional to remove the next an. I was putting back in the bs jim told me to. Look at the edit history.
<br>Jim, could you say something. When you told me I asked you [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jim1138#p_square_edit_war_board ???]. You explained [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.50.21.190&oldid=622633305] and then I put back [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=next&oldid=622633440] in the bs. The next an3 section being removed was removed unintentionally. I am never allowed to finish my edits before kirin or bill isreverting so I didnt get the chance to re add the next an3. You did. [[Special:Contributions/68.50.21.190|68.50.21.190]] ([[User talk:68.50.21.190#top|talk]]) 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=acroterion, once I was made aware (jim told me) I reverted and put the bs back in. That revert is what you are 'calling vandalism and disruptive editing ' to an3. The 'extensive changes' were by accident, it was not intentional to remove the next an. I was putting back in the bs jim told me to. Look at the edit history.
<br>Jim, could you say something. When you told me I asked you [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jim1138#p_square_edit_war_board ???]. You explained [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.50.21.190&oldid=622633305] and then I put back [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=next&oldid=622633440] in the bs. The next an3 section being removed was removed unintentionally. I am never allowed to finish my edits before kirin or bill isreverting so I didnt get the chance to re add the next an3. You did. [[Special:Contributions/68.50.21.190|68.50.21.190]] ([[User talk:68.50.21.190#top|talk]]) 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=acroterion, once I was made aware (jim told me) I reverted and put the bs back in. That revert is what you are 'calling vandalism and disruptive editing ' to an3. The 'extensive changes' were by accident, it was not intentional to remove the next an. I was putting back in the bs jim told me to. Look at the edit history.
<br>Jim, could you say something. When you told me I asked you [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jim1138#p_square_edit_war_board ???]. You explained [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.50.21.190&oldid=622633305] and then I put back [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=next&oldid=622633440] in the bs. The next an3 section being removed was removed unintentionally. I am never allowed to finish my edits before kirin or bill isreverting so I didnt get the chance to re add the next an3. You did. [[Special:Contributions/68.50.21.190|68.50.21.190]] ([[User talk:68.50.21.190#top|talk]]) 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.