Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Philharmonic Hall, London

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Fuebaey (talk | contribs) at 09:47, 27 November 2014 (promoted to prep 3). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Philharmonic Hall, London

[edit]

Philharmonic Hall in 1917

  • ... that London's Philharmonic Hall (pictured) once had one of 30 car showrooms all in the same street?
  • Reviewed: Not a self-nom

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 23:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC).

  • The article doesn't say that the hall had a car showroom, only that it shared the building with a car dealership.--Carabinieri (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Actually, it only says that it was next door to a car dealership.--Carabinieri (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • It wasn't "next door", it was part of the ground floor space. It's all the same building. How about Alt1 "... that London's Philharmonic Hall building (pictured) once had one of 30 car showrooms all in the same street? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Created on 13 October, long enough, neutral. The hook is cited – I could verify that the building housed a car dealership but the reference for the fact there were 30 in the street is offline. I saw no close paraphrasing when spotchecking sources. @Philafrenzy: One small issue is that the "Location" section is unsourced, and another is that the first paragraph of "BBC use" is cited to ref 4 but the source doesn't seem to support any of the preceding information. (Also note that in future, due to a change in DYK rules, non-self-noms like this will have to be submitted with a QPQ.) 97198 (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I added some extra references which should cover all that. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • That should do the trick. I forgot to mention above that the image is free to use, so this should be good to go. 97198 (talk) 04:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)