This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
If you simply need to ask for help in making an edit, please change the template to {{help me}}.
Those of us in the Brenner v Scott now Armstrong case would like to ask that the photo located on the web site of the Jax paper be used on this site. This photo was taken BY the plaintiffs and supplied to our attys to be used by the press. We have others that can also be used if you do not want to use the one from the Times Union.
The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start here and use the Upload Wizard. Then give us a link to the file here. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While I am an 'unregistered' editor (too much arguing going on here! is why I ain't registered), and thus can not upload stuff , I would like to thank you, Bmclaughlin9 (talk), for assisting in both matters:
First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)
Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.96.59.130.176 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
