Jump to content

User talk:Toddy1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Виктор Ш. (talk | contribs) at 22:25, 3 March 2015 (→‎NPOV discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Can you become the Supreme Leader of the Supreme Cabal?
Wikibreak
Third opinion
$220
Chance
?
Mediation
$220
Arbitration
$240
Jimbo Wales
$200
In the news
$260
On this day
$260
MediaWiki
$150
Did you know
$280
You are banned!
RFA
$200
WIKIOPOLYFPC
$300
PERM
$180
POTD
$300
Community discussionCommunity discussion
Editor review
$180
FAC
$320
Developers
$200
Rouge admin
$200
Deletion review
$160
Chance
?
AFD
$140
TFA
$350
Wikimedia Foundation
$150
Edit war
(pay $100)
CSD
$140
Main Page
$400
WP:BANNED
Just browsing
WikiProject Spam
$120
UAA
$100
Chance
?
AIV
$100
Admin cabal
$200
Teh Drahmaz
(pay $200)
AN
$60
Community discussionANI
$60
Go
Collect $200 salary as you pass


Fresh news

He is famous now . Recently his page was removed from owned by him domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов (talkcontribs) 19:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

spasibo.-- Toddy1 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Husayn ibn Ali‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: 1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made. 2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Ialiabbas (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ialiabbas

Thanks for letting me know about the link to the discussion. I definitely do not mind. Edward321 (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported them atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/:Ialiabbas Edward321 (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV discussion

Please join in the discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#.22Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation.22