Jump to content

User talk:MONGO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stanfordandson (talk | contribs) at 17:16, 23 July 2006 (please don't tamper with deletion reviews). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives

Archive 1 (January 2005 to June 2005)
Archive 2 (July 2005 to October 2005)
Archive 3 (November 2005)
Archive 4 (December 2005)
Archive 5 (January 2006)
Archive 6 (February 2006)
Archive 7 (March 2006)
Archive 8 (April 2006)
Archive 9 (May 2006)
Archive 10 (June 2006)
Archive 11 (July 2006)


This is a STERN barnstar. You have been awarded this as a warning that you are doing something right. Please continue. If you do, you may find yourself being severely complimented without further warnings. Award issued by KillerChihuahua, Just zis Guy you know?, InShaneee, Kasreyn, ChrisO, Elonka and Lord Voldemort per this.

Ile de France stuff

Even with the server problems, one ought to be careful about such things. (Especially if, um, you were aware that there were server issues). john k 17:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair enough. I suppose no harm's done, since I restored it. john k 22:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

letting you know

Please don't be offended by this (for speedy deletion now). I am not trying to upset you or anything, just letting you know, you're not the only one. Hardvice 07:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request

Hi, I was wondering whether you could protect this page - User:Daniel.Bryant/GraalOnline - because the mediation submissions are finished, and now I (the mediator) will go off and deliberate. In this time, I want to minimize a war of words. Killfest2 (Talk) 10:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tamper with deletion reviews

Please stop tampering with deletion reviews. I made no personal attacks and merely noted the process by which the article was deleted, which is perfectly consistent with how deletion review works. Stanfordandson 17:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]