This talk page is known to be monitored by talk page watchers. This means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot respond to quickly is appreciated.
Welcome to Yunshui's talk page.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. If you reply to me elsewhere, please {{ping}} me or leave a {{talkback}} template here - I have over 4,000 pages on my watchlist and may miss your response otherwise. To leave me a new message on this page, please click here.
If you are here because of a page that I deleted, please take a moment to read this page first.
I prefer to keep communications on-wiki if possible, but if you need to discuss something privately, please send me an email.
I have never seen an entire talk page be deleted before. How can discussion take place on improving the article if there is no talk page? You have deleted the talk page citing it was an "attack page" and a "Biography of a living Person". If such content was on the page the logical thing would have been to undo it from the talk page if valid; not remove the entire talk page. If you are an Admin then I declare it unethical and wrong that this talk page has been removed and demand that this talk page be restored to Wikipedia or you will reap what you sow (get bad karma). It seems you are some powerful special interest group does not want any discussion on this article topic. 71.79.56.225 (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll live with the bad karma, thanks. Without giving details, suffice to say that talkpages are for discussion of the associated article, not of the article's subject. The content I deleted didn't belong either in the talkpage or in its history; since it was the only content on the talkpage I deleted the whole thing, rather than the individual revision. Yunshui雲水08:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
why am I tagged in posts on another page??
Hello why am I being tagged in a spammish post I don't know how to use this site but I keep getting emails about a account block and an ongoing conversation. This is very annoying please take me off if you can. I don't know if this is in the talk section or where to place this. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C0F1:AC10:2593:FB19:6F16:558D (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I really have no idea what you are referring to. If you give me some more information I may be able to help, but right now I don't know what you're talking about. Yunshui雲水14:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
follow up to Teahouse answer
Yunshui, you answered a question I posted at the Teahouse regarding how to empty/clear sandbox?. I responded with another question but no one seems to have picked up on it. So, I'll ask you directly:
What would have happened if I had simply highlighted the whole article in my sandbox and deleted it, to clear the page. I assume it would have registered as an edit, but what else? I didn't choose this route because I feared causing some unintended chaos, in part because of the Redirect link that had appeared at the top of the article.
Sorry about that. The answer is that you would have blanked the article - the live article - and probably have been told off for doing so. Remember, whilst the redirect is in place you were being directed from your sandbox to the article in mainspace, so if you were able to see the text of the article when you opened the edit screen, you were no longer looking at your sandbox (which would have had something like #REDIRECT [[name of live article]] as its only content). Good thing you didn't take that option!
The easy way to check is to look at the page title (the main heading at the top) - if it says "Editing User:Cantabile3/sandbox" then you're editing your sandbox; if it says something else, then you're editing something else. Yunshui雲水08:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi yunshui, was going through such stuff here, it seems that a i.p is just going on creating name pages with redirects as its content to a serial how to go about this ? is it right with wiki ? Shrikanthv (talk) 06:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't checked all of them, but this user seems to be creating redirects for actors who are not in themselves notable to take readers to the TV shows for which the actors are known. Nothing wrong with that - all the ones I've looked at seem to be valid redirects, and they can always be overwritten if the actors later become article-worthy. Yunshui雲水08:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You could nominate it, but it still needs a lot of work. At the moment, some of the key issues that would need to be addressed are:
the prose - the grammar and sentence structure throughout the article is very convuluted and difficult to understand
the lead - contains information which is not in the article body, as well as some unique sources
unsourced statements (see the section on Jung in particular)
original research - in several places, there appears to be an interpretive slant on original philosopical texts
coverage - I get the impression that the coverage could be considerably broader: where, for example, is the information on intuition in sport, in the Myer-Briggs types, in business (needs more than one sentence, whole books have been written about business intuition), as a truth verification system, as a guide to morality? There is a lot more that could conceivably be included in the article.
You've done a sterling job improving the article - it looks much better than it did when you started - but it's not going to pass a GA review in its current state. Yunshui雲水09:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hadn't talked to you in a few months
Yunshui, I have decided that I will work more on American silent films of Sessue Hayakawa and Tsuru Aoki, two popular Japanese born stars in Hollywood. I intent to take Hayakawa owned Haworth Pictures Corporation to GT status along with its several productions. I have applied to Newspapers.com to find more sources on these films. In most of his films Hayakawa was typecast as a villain and some people in Japan have criticised him for presenting a wrong view of the Japanese people. I will begin work once my exams are over. Regards,--Skr15081997 (talk) 10:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Its been so long! How have you been? You are doing an amazing job! Take a brief time out and enjoy this delightful cupcake. — Yash[talk]13:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to get into a medical college so had to focus on my studies. Now that I got there, I can spare some time for Wikipeia :) — Yash[talk]13:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see you that you previously had a dialogue going with this vandal. Unfortunately, he appears to be backsliding into vandalism again. [1] Just thought you should know. Cheers, GentlemanGhost(converse)20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
Hello, Yunshui. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at User talk:The Herald/Talkback. Message added 05:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
