Jump to content

Talk:Julie Meyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 178.250.45.86 (talk) at 19:52, 18 April 2015 (→‎Julie Meyer and Ariadne Capital is a 'scam'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

General updates made and references added.



Julie Meyer and Ariadne Capital is a 'scam'

Julie Meyer and Ariadne Capital has a very bad reputation in the industry. She has gone through multiple PR firms. And constantly edits her own wikipedia page. Would you please ensure the facts are correct. She and her firm has been involved in numerous litigation with her own clients as well as suppliers. Her own current and ex-employees do not have anything positive to say about her. Her reputation as an entrepreneur is unsubstantiated. Ariadne goes around asking entrepreneurs for sweat equity and falsely claim she has help invested or raised over 350 million. Ariadne has had numerous litigation and judgement issued against them, including a windup petition for paltry sums of a few thousand pounds! What investment advisory firm would end up in that position? and not pay their own employees. It is a house built on sound. Unfortunately she has used PR to cover up for her mediocre and poor performance as an advisor and non-existant track record as an investor. Which investment advisor firm files small business exempt accounts, gets into litigation with own suppliers and clients numerous times? Techcrunch wrote about her in the past, but no one has really dug deep enough. Please do NOT delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.250.45.86 (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions towards Julie Meyer's wikipedia page

{{request edit}}

Dear Editor,

My names is Kapil Arya and I am writing to you on behalf of Lansons, a PR company that represent Ms Julie Meyer and Ariadne Capital. We were hoping to contribute some new information about Julie to help ensure that the page is as up-to-date and accurate as possible. We are, however, unsure about how best to go about suggesting new contributions and were hoping to seek your advice on this. All information will, of course, be supported by relevant documents and links to public sources. If you could offer any advice about how to update Julie’s page it would be much appreciated.

Many thanks,

Kapil



Kapil Arya



Good practice is to provide:

  1. The existing text which should be replaced (optional, if the only desired edit is an addition)
  2. The desired text to be used instead
  3. A RS supporting the new material

In some cases, it may be helpful to provide some context, e.g. is this simply missing material, has something changed, is the existing material wrong, or just awkwardly worded.

Here is an example:

The section foo currently read:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

It would be better if it read:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

The facts are supported by: [1]

References

  1. ^ "bar". New York Times. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. Retrieved 24 Jun 2014.