Common Cause

Common Cause is a U.S. nonpartisan citizens' lobbying group (both professionally on Capitol Hill and grassroots advocacy in the states). According to their website, "Common Cause works for open, accountable government and the right of all citizens to be involved in shaping our nation's public policies". Their priorities include legislation to reform election campaigns, improving ethics and accountability in government, and equal rights for all citizens.

Common Cause was founded in 1970 by John William Gardner, who was the U.S. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Common Cause is a nationwide membership organization with members in all 50 states. It has 50 state chapters which lobby their legislatures as well as an active Washington, D.C. lobbying team. See Susan Tannenbaum

Chellie Pingree, a former state senator from North Haven, Maine, who ran an unsuccessful campaign to unseat Susan Collins in 2002 is the President and CEO of the organization.

History

John Gardner, a Republican, came to Washington, DC to serve as the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under President Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat. Gardner later became chair of the National Urban Coalition, a group advocating for poor, minority, and working-class residents in urban areas.

During his time in the nation's capital, a city teeming with special interest groups, he observed "everybody's organized but the people." That thought formed the seed of Common Cause, which Gardner established in August 1970 to represent citizens' interests in Washington. Within six months, the organization had more than 100,000 members, many of them joining to oppose the Vietnam War.

Since that time, Common Cause has been involved in many of the most pressing issues facing contemporary American politics. The organization led fights for campaign finance reforms, ethics and accountability in government, and open government at the national, state and local levels.

Common Cause has joined with coalitions to fight for civil rights legislation, ending wasteful weapons programs and working for reforms to our nation's system of voting, the most recent of which is the campaign to promote Clean Elections, a voluntary system of publicly funded campaigns on the Federal level. Common Cause has had measured success implementing similar election practices in Maine, Connecticut, and Arizona.

The Issues

Common Cause works with its members and activists and in coalition with other advocacy organizations (Public Campaign, Public Citizen, U.S. PIRG) towards forwarding its stated goal of making government more accountable to the people. They have been engaged in a wide range of issues for more than thirty years, succeeding in many reforms. For an official complete list of these issues, click Here.

Common Cause has led efforts for campaign finance reform, ethics and accountability in government, as well as transparent government practices at the national, state, and local levels. They have partnered with coalitions fighting for civil rights legislation, ending what they have considered to be wasteful weapons programs, and working for progressive reforms of the United States system of voting.

Media and Democracy Program

It can be argued that in recent years the media has increasingly failed to provide diverse viewpoints and unbiased information, and that this is undermining the strength of United States democracy. Dissatisfaction with news coverage of events ranging from the 2000 presidential election to the war in Iraq has given media issues a new sense of urgency. The more corporate conglomerates buy up independent news outlets, the fewer voices and perspectives the public hears, and the less accountable broadcasters are to the public.

Common Cause works to ensure that the media meet their obligations to serve the public by promoting diversity, accessibility, and accountability among media corporations and the government agencies that regulate the media. Their Media and Democracy program has four goals:

Fighting media consolidation,
Protecting public broadcasting,
Holding the media accountable by promoting public interest obligations,
Developing and advancing a long-term agenda for a more democratic media.

Over the course of the past year, Common Cause has played an important role in fighting media consolidation and protecting the editorial integrity of public broadcasting. The organization's current campaign for more open and diverse media takes place in the context of three major legislative and regulatory proceedings:

The reopening of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, posing the promise of media reforms that guarantee the public interest will be served across media platforms.

FCC action on media ownership rules that will affect the degree of media consolidation and vertical integration that the government will permit.

Legislation furthering the transition from analog to digital spectrum, which offers opportunities for the reform community to secure more broadcaster accountability, as well as public funds (a percentage of proceeds from spectrum auctions) for public broadcasting and noncommercial media, and an allocation of unlicensed spectrum for public use.

Money in Politics

The dominating influence of wealthy special interests in the funding of campaigns has greatly eroded public trust in the United States political system and has discouraged political participation. In a system that gives undue access to lawmakers and influence on legislation to those who contribute large amounts to campaigns, most citizens believe their voice is not being heard. On a whole range of issues - environment, healthcare, taxes - Common Cause sees corporations and wealthy individuals benefiting at the expense of all Americans.

Common Cause is working for campaign finance reforms that will help bring government back to the people by reducing the influence of wealthy special interests, expanding public funding of campaigns and encouraging campaigns to seek funding from a broader base of small contributors.

Common Cause was a leading advocate in the successful fight for public financing of presidential campaigns and has worked for public financing of congressional campaigns for many years. At the state level, Common Cause is a strong supporter of clean elections systems in Maine and Arizona, worked to successfully pass clean elections in Connecticut and is working with other organizations to pass similar reforms in other states, including California, Maryland, and Rhode Island. Common Cause has been a leader in passing reforms at the municipal level, including New York City, Los Angeles, and other cities.

Common Cause helped lead the fight to ban soft money: the huge, unlimited campaign contributions that were undermining the federal system of public financing and contribution limits. In 2002, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act was enacted and a year later a historic U.S. Supreme Court decision, McConnell v. FEC, upheld the law. Initial studies show that the law has effectively banned soft money and pushed political parties and candidates to seek small donations from a broad base of contributors, thus broadening the participation of average citizens in campaigns.

Government Accountability

A free society depends upon a high degree of mutual trust. The public will not give that trust to officials who are not seen to be impartially dedicated to the general public interest, nor will they give trust to those high in government who violate the rule of law they ask citizens to obey at the expense of self-interest, or to those who present government as the place where one feathers his own nest, [or] exchanges favors with friends and former associates. -Archibald Cox, Common Cause Chairman Emeritus

Common Cause states that it is dedicated to making government open and accountable. Their founder, John Gardner, once said "We want public officials to have literally millions of American citizens looking over their shoulders at every move they make." Since the organization he founded first started "looking over shoulders" in 1970, Common Cause and its activists have worked to ensure that government officials are acting in the public interest, not for their own personal benefit or for the benefit of powerful and influential special interests.

Common Cause has worked to shine a bright light on public officials and lobbyists who prefer to work behind closed doors. It has also insisted that government officials are held to the highest standards of conduct.

Ethics Watchdog

Since its founding, Common Cause has been active in the fight for stronger ethics at all levels of government. They are proponents of the ideal that the integrity of government is fundamental to American democracy. Common Cause continues to monitor the activities of members of both Congress as well ass state and local lawmakers to assure that they uphold the highest standards in carrying out their duties and responsibilities.

In Congress, Common Cause is working to replace what they consider to be the current weak and discredited ethics process in both the House of Representatives and the Senate with a more meaningful process of policing ethics that makes members of Congress accountable to the public. To further this goal, the organization specifically supports the establishment an independent panel of experts outside of Congress to strengthen the ethics reporting process.

Improving Disclosure Laws

Common Cause also argues that laws requiring public disclosure of lobbying activities, personal financial interests and campaign contributions are a critical element in ensuring government accountability. Common Cause believes it will strengthen the hand of citizen advocates and watchdog groups by working to increase the enforcement of financial and lobbying disclosure laws, as well as acting to promote legislation which would require lobbyists and campaign donors to fully disclose their activities and donations instantly on the Internet.

Open Government

A core element of Common Cause’s agenda is making certain that government operates in the open at all levels, with full access for the public to meetings and public records throughout the legislative and regulatory policymaking process. They are working to make sure that the best use of new technologies is used to provide access for the public, including the webcasting of meetings and hearings, Internet-based public participation, as well as easily-searchable databases of legislation, elected officials’ voting records, and other important public information.

Fighting Government Secrecy

Another issue raised by Common Cause is their belief that the George W. Bush Administration, in addition to many state and local government bodies, have placed harsh restrictions on the information freely available to the press and public, thus rolling back important freedoms previously passed to prevent abuses of power under the shroud of secrecy. Specifically, the organization is working to protect the Freedom of Information Act, and to reverse the percieved current trend towards secrecy in American government, which has been carried out under the pretext of protecting national security.

Protecting Whistleblowers

Common Cause also argues that honest insiders who risk their careers to call attention to wrongdoing and deceptive practices in government are true heroes of Democracy. As such, they are working to strengthen protections for whistleblowers and help people feel safe coming forward with information that protects the public from waste, fraud, corruption, and abuse.

Election Reform Agenda

Common Cause is working to reform the system of voting in the United States. They support the easing of barriers to voting, election administration designed to help voters, openness throughout the elections process, nonpartisan supervision of elections, and making the manner in which Americans vote a higher priority at all levels of government.

Common Cause has recently worked with civil rights and other organizations for passage of the 2006 vote which extented citical provisions of the Voting Rights Act. They are also currently working in several states to take the important task of redistricting out of the hands of partisan politicians.

Addressing the Problems Voters Face in Registration

Common Cause argues that registration should no longer be a barrier to voting. During the 2000 presidential election, a MIT/CalTech study estimated that 3 million voters were disenfranchised due to voter registration problems. Registration problems also appear to have been the most frequently encountered problem in 2004, as Common Cause’s phone hotline for voting issues at the time registered thousands of calls about registration problems.

Reforms Recommended by Common Cause

Comply with the HAVA-required statewide voter registration database
Give citizens the ability to register to vote on Election Day
Impose nationally uniform and fair indetification requirements

Expand Election Day

The high turnout in the 2004 United States presidential election was both encouraging and exciting for political pundits and voting rights groups. But the U.S. still has one of the lowest voter turnout rates in the modern world. Common Cause seeks to address this issue by advocating that the United States government should knock down another major barrier to voting: the time period allowed for voting, which is currently only one day. They argue that expanding both the number of ways and the amount of time in which people can vote would increase voter turnout.

Reforms Recommended by Common Cause

Making sure that no-fault absentee voting in allowed
Allowing early voting in the case of time conflicts
Allowing more widespread mail-in voting methods
Encouraging employers to give time off for voting
Making Election Day a national holiday

Enforce Laws Prohibiting Voter Suppression/Intimidation

The U.S. Department of Justice as well as state elections officials must make monitoring and defending the right to vote a top priority. The long history of suppression of voting in racial and ethnic communities makes this an especially important task. The U.S. Department of Justice and state and local authorities must have in place adequate and funded programs to protect Americans from efforts to intimidate voters at the polling place and before the election. While it is important that only eligible voters are allowed to vote, it is also important that political parties and other advocates not engage in activities such as systematic and arbitrary challenging of voters intended to intimidate voters and disrupt elections.

Recommended Reforms

State and local governments need to make strong statements about protecting the rights of voters on Election Day
State and local government need to enforce existing laws and prosecute illegal activities intended to intimidate voters or disrupt turnout.

Local and state election officials should allow international and nonpartisan election observers to observe polling places without prior notice or permission, provided they do not disrupt Election Day.

Establish statewide standards for challenges procedures characterized by transparency and fairness, including penalties for partisan or otherwise frivolous challenges.

Re-Enfrachisement

Millions of Americans, particularly minorities, cannot vote because states either permanently deny that fundamental right to felons or make it difficult to restore the right. The right to vote should be automatically restored to people who have been convicted of a felony and have served their time in prison.

Reccommended Reform

Re-enfranchisement should be automatic upon completion of parole. Individuals who have paid their debt to society should not be required to take additional actions to restore their right to vote.

Reduce Partisanship and Conflict of Interest in Election Administration

Government officials in charge of running elections should not be engaged in partisan political campaigns if we are to have elections voters can trust. Elections officials must maintain avoid any real or apparent conflict of interest with the vendors who provide equipment and assistance in many areas of election administration.

Action For Elections

Election Day. You press the button, color in the circle, check the box, poke out the dots, sign your absentee ballot, or possibly even pull a lever. There, you've done it, registered your opinion about the direction our government should take. It's an act of faith: Will your vote be counted? Will the election result accurately reflect the intent of the voters?

It’s time for Congress to step up to the plate and fix the broken system. Voters must be able to trust that their votes will be counted and that the election will be fair, open to all qualified citizens, and auditable. Americans must be able to feel confident that machine manufacturers and election officials answer to no interests except those of the voters.

Recommended Reforms

Prohibit non-elected election administrators from participating in partisan political campaigns.
Elected officials should be limited to participation in their own campaigns.
Include nonpartisan and unaffiliated voters in decision-making, poll watching and other aspects of election administration.
Establish strict conflict-of-interest laws for all elections officials.

External links

This organization-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.