Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuzlocke

Nuzlocke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, rationale being that the article has sources. Nevertheless I really don't think this Pokemon trivia is worthy of a standalone article: essentially it's fancruft.TheLongTone (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable thing made up by a bored kid that got posted online, not encyclopedic, and definitely not notable enough for a standalone article.Chris lk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrislk02:It may have been made up by someone but isn't everything? The multitude of Kotaku articles on this matter and that entire 1000+ word article don't prove this is notable? --☣Anar chyte☣ 22:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per above: a subpopulation's private interest in an ephemeral passtime. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Pokemon#Fan community as suggested below. I also considered moving I saw no obvious target but this is a good option. ~~Delete~~ unfortunately because News found several results while Books found a recently published book and thefreelibrary had the IBTimes link. I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no target. It's worth mentioning if no one else has noticed that this was nominated for a DYK. SwisterTwister talk 00:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Pokemon#Fan community Nuzlocke is worthy of mention wrt. the reliable sources (Kotaku, IBTimes, iDigital Times etc.) in the article, but I don't see it deserveing a separate article, especially not in this state. Pokemon#Fan community already has a bullet point about this which I think well sums up everything needed to be mentioned.野狼院ひさし u/t/c 02:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge any relevant content to Pokemon#Fan community. Separate article not required.Blethering Scot 16:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As Anarchyte said, the amount of sources in the article establishes notability. At this point, you're just arbitrarily deciding what's notable and what's not. User:Logan The Master