User talk:Improvethewiki

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - Note that your signature needs to include a link to your user page and/or to your user talk page, see WP:SIGLINK. -David Biddulph (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolicited feedback

Hi, I'm one of the two who have responded to you at Help Desk. I skimmed the discussion in article talk, and I'll say you're already on a higher plane than most editors with a year of experience, and many never get there. You're not just making a statement, but at least trying to back it up with reason and policy. Are you really new at this? My only suggestion would be an attempt to be less verbose, as many have short attention spans and are likely to move on if they see an enormous post like that. Myself, I have what I believe to be ADD (undiagnosed), and I simply can't maintain focus long enough to read and absorb a post of that size. I'd aim for a maximum size of about half that, and shorter yet where possible. No opinion as to the content question, no knowledge or interest in that area. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you want some one-on-one discussion, but be aware that anyone could be reading it. Best,―Mandruss ☎ 10:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]