Jump to content

User talk:ManiF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ManiF (talk | contribs) at 02:08, 31 July 2006 (Archiving talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For older discussion, see Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

From Soso

I changed Bagrationi link to Bagrationi Dynasty. Please do not change it back.
Soso


Alembic

Which sentences that I added on Alembic, do you disagree on?jidan 13:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


No, I think you want just to give me hard time. There are many articles on wiki that don't have reference like these:

But you still don't delete them, becasue its not contoversial or were disputed by a user.And I didn't attack you, I attacked what you do. You don't have to note that down to use it against me later, because I will not be editing wiki anymore. Not because of you, but becasue I think my time is MUCH more valuable than this. Khoda Hafez ManiF. jidan 14:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email enabled

Greetings Mani. My email's been enabled. Let me know what's up. Cheers. Tombseye 04:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy's paragraph,

Okay I'll remove that one too. Don't you think the source seem kinda suspect?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 13:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait can you point me to the section that it is in?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 13:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K, is their anything else I missed?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 14:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Design me one of tose user tags

Make one saying this user dreams of the reunification of Azarbaijan with Iran. Plus look at the Azari-related articles. Azaris are ethnic Iranians and no ground should be given o the issue. I have provided countless verification,but what really bothers me is user:Grandmasters propaganda campaing to erase the term Azari and Azarbaijan with Azeri and Azerbaijan. Thanks 72.57.230.179

Re:Simon Wiesenthal Center

Rabbi Hier is referring to an editorial by Amir Taheri, which is a different article from the one used as a source. In addition, Rabbi Hier is citing National Post editorial to refer to the developing consensus, not the law itself. Pecher Talk 20:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's your source for the claim that National Post is investigating the issue and may retract the story? Again, I cannot see any indication that Simon Wiesenthal Center based its lettter on a National Post's editorial. Pecher Talk 21:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo

Read Email

The Iranian buissiness

OK. I wasn't really checking for other sources @ the time, just trying to organized what I saw as a mess already there, so I missed that. If it hasn't been already, I'll integrate that into it. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 01:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revised. Look any better? I'm still going to try and report on the timeline of the reporting. 68.39.174.238 01:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, the original story is back again! 68.39.174.238 01:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The link at the bottom of the articel on the "law" works, assuming that's the same one. Also, I've tried to make sure everything in the intro has the same tense. 68.39.174.238 02:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I never saw the original articel, so you'll have to look at the link that works and see if its the same as the old one that's gone now. 68.39.174.238 02:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salam

Salam!

Omidvaram ke halet khoob basheh. ManiF, man yek editore mosalmoon hastam ke yek modate ziyadiyeh ke tooye wikipedia fa'al boodam. Man modate ziyadi rooye maghaleye Criticism of Islam kar kardam. Mitoonam begam ke 75% ghesmathayi ke javab midan be criticism ha rou man neveshtam. Valy kam kam mikham az wikipedia bekesham kenar, choon kheyly vaghtamoo migireh. Doost dashtam nazdikeh raftanam "Zora" rou ke be nazaram etela'atesh ziyadeh va ehsasate zedde islamish az taghriban aksareh editorhaye non-muslim digeh kamtare rou be ounvane "Administrator" kandida konam. ManiF, man tooye wikipedia kheyli ba editor haye mokhtalef dar oftadam. Masalan "Dhimmi" rou bebin. Dahanam saf shodeh ba bazi az editor ha mesle pecher. Be nazareh man Zora kheyli nesbate be baghiyeh maghool tareh(Tooye moghayese migam). Zora hazer nist ghabool koneh ke candida besheh. Migeh ke vaseye khodesh doshman ziyad doroost kardeh. Goftesh ke ba shoma va Zereshk kheyli conflict dashteh. Hala man yek darkhast az shoma daram. Aya hich conditioni hast ke tahteh oun shoma ba Administrator zora mokhalefat nakoni? Masalan inkeh Zora az Administrator boodanesh tooye yek seri maghaleha estefadeh nakoneh ya ... Faghat mikhastam bedoonam ke sadetarin sharti ke doost dari bezari ke ba Administrator Zora mokhalefat nakoni chiyeh. Vaseye har chizi rahi hast, rahe in chiyeh? Kheyli mamnoon. --Aminz 03:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ManiF, man iraniyam! bavar kon! man alan 2 sale omadam amrica vaseye edameye tahsil. Iran ham daneshgahe sharif miraftam, mohandesiye bargh. Aslan ham kermooni hastam. Khoob, ageh orkut kar mikoni mitooni esmam rou search koni: amin aminzadeh gohari. digeh inkeh, chera? misheh be man begi chera sabeghash badeh. be khoda, editor haye digeyi hastan ke dahane manoo saf kardan. zora ke maghoole. yek soal: tooye islam hatta zane 3 talaghe rou ham rahe hal dareh ke dobareh gereftesh; in ham bayad dashteh basheh. --Aminz 04:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ghabool, yek soal, ageh az zora bekham ke tooye topic haye irani az ekhtiyarate admin aslan estefadeh nakoneh, oun vaght aya ghabool mikonin ke behesh ra'aye mosbat bedin? mersi --Aminz 05:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Khoob, basheh. Mesle inkeh karish nemisheh kard va rahi vojood nadareh. khoob, shad bashin. khodahafez. --Aminz 06:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian cinema

This user participates in the
Persian cinema task force.

--K a s h Talk | email 14:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sports

We do indeed.--Zereshk 22:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An attack?

The phrase "Zereshk and his friends" is an attack? Sorry, I can't see that it is. Zora 00:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Persianism

Eshtehbah mehkonee. There is no consensus. It should be Anti-Persianism or Anti-Persian racism. Your comments to Mani1 are wrong. Khorshid 10:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Persian sentiments is more in line with similar articles, but Anti-Persianism is fine too. --ManiF 10:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a doublespeak. They want to bully everyone and you accept this? I said that this is not anti-national sentiment, but racism. People have been murdered over these things. It should be taken more seriously. Look at this Lukas person and his comments. I am made sick. Khorshid 10:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert LukasPietsch's comments from my talk page. He is harassing me. Khorshid 12:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want to bring something to your Attention

This was written[1] and this was the response [2].

Here is the translation: How are you. To soon to give a complicated comment. These protests have been forming a long time coming and they are ripening, this wan not and necessary the only occasion, so that it would splash out to the streets. The basic problem is the fact that they [Iran?/Persians? I don't know who, but he says they] reject tp the Azaris the right to thei national identity, the right to the development of their own language and distinct culture. You can see even here, in the consideration of articles, Iranian Azarbaijan and Azarbaijanians. Some Iranian participants insist on saying Azaris are an Iranian ethnicity, although it is widely-known that Azaris are Turkic. This is what is being represented or occuring in Iran itself. Conflict apparently on this basis, people [Azaris] require the protection of their cultural rights.

These is only the tip of the ice berg. 72.57.230.179

When are we Going to See Proof that Azaris are Genetically Turkic

Please keep an eye on Azari and the talk:Azari. I have started the following in the discussion.

It has been ages since these citations have not been verified. Verification is needed. If not delete the material. the amount of time granted has been generious. The Azaris Iranian background has been verified through various scientific and academic sources, but the Turkic claim has not. The only think that has been verified is the Turkic langauge. 72.57.230.179

Sabiha Gökçen

look man, as you see you are converting to a thing with misinformation since it is not the military, it is herself and the official documents that claim the opposite but you are not adding that. The bbc website is putting the claim from an armenian newspaper if turkish source is not neutral you can not add that~either. 85.101.57.181 05:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johnstevens5

I have reported this user because of constant anti-Persian, Turkish-nationalist POV and the Babur, Mughals, Timurids, Alisher Navoi, Ulugh Beg, and al-Farabi articles. --> [3]

Tajik 15:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babur

That the Mughal Empire, in general, brought Persian influences to India is not questioned in anyway. Humayun, after all, spent a great portion of his life in exile in Iran. The citation requests however concerned the pre-Mughal Berlas tribe, and also the pre Mughal Timurid elite. --Irishpunktom\talk 16:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not revert you, but the nonsense of User:Johnstevens5. I guess you had simply forgotten to rv his false claims. Tajik 21:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh ... now I see. I myself forgot to rv the word "Turk". Sorry for that. I've removed it now. Tajik 21:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CFD "Designated terrorist organizations" underway

I thought you may be interested,

see here

Count Iblis 23:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

I'll keep a headups on those article whenever I check wikipedia.. --Ali doostzadeh 04:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Look at Talk:Safavid dynasty

The Wikipedia: WikiProject Azeri label has been placed on the top of the article even though the work was done by the Iranian WikiProject. This user, Baku87, along with GM and someothers are really disruptive to Iranian articles and making statements saying Azaris are harmed and abused in Iran or want to seperate, etc. 69.196.164.190

maghale sooe tafahom darbare iran

agar mikhahid vaghan maghale ra hefz konid , lotfan an ra eslah konid. hamantor ke be zareshl ghablan goftam alan in maghale khoob nist. behtare taghyyrati dar an bedahid.


[4]

and [5]

Good buy.--Sa.vakilian 11:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

G'day ManiF,

I've not even had Greater and Lesser Tunbs unprotected for three hours, and already you're edit warring! This is not acceptable. I think you need to take the next twenty-four hours off to reconsider your aggressive editing, and I have blocked you accordingly. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 14:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concerns, but I didn't revert excessively, I didn't break WP:3RR or any other rules. I only restored the original version before the unilateral POV changes by a user who was acting against the consensus. I was acting within wikipedia rules, please unblock me. --ManiF 15:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article had only just been unprotected after an edit war. WP:3RR is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor an entitlement: it's a hard limit. 3RR is not the only way to be blocked for aggressive editing, and is not the reason you're blocked here — you revert warred on an article, even though you knew that aggressive editing would be frowned on. If you'd like the views of another administrator, feel free to bung in a {{unblock}} tag at the bottom of this page, and someone else will come along and review the case. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 15:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mark, please check your e-mail. --ManiF 15:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and please take note that I only came upon that article yesterday, and I had never edited there before until today, let alone edit war. I only restored the original version of the article twice, acting based on the consensus on the talk page. So I knew nothing about the history of that page, and if you had issued me a prior warning, I'd have gladly accepted it. From now on, I will be more careful, I always try to edit within the framework of Wiki. So please reconsider you decision and unblock me. Thanks. --ManiF 15:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please watch this page and post your public messages on this page so that everybody may have access to it. Thanks --Aminz 05:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Yes i know what 3RR is and don't worry i was not gonna violate it. I aprreciate your concern though :). Regarding the argue, it was not an argue from my part, just a reminder why it is called the way it is. Furthermore if we keep silent when for example he says 200,000,000 arabs use arabian gulf in their maps, the admins will think he is speaking the truth. So its better to respond in some cases even if its to a banned sockpuppet :). Ba sepaas, --Spahbod ☼ 01:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see, did not know that. You get the clarification this time, i will next time he appears :). --Spahbod ☼ 02:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ManiF&oldid=66781825"