User talk:Adiagr

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Invading the Sacred. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specific references in the article have been given. This is a synopsis of a book, in whihc I have tried to add to one of the sections. Opinions given in the book have been mentioned and no personal version is added =. Content certainly has scope of improvement and I will improve it further, but giving personal and high handed generic warnings to contributors can be avoided. Adiagr (talk) 08:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 16:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adiagr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have always used my id adiagr for editing and adding content and till date have not used any other user id. I take strong exception to this charge. I would like to see what proofSpaceman has for taking this unilateral decision. This is totally against the spirit of wikipedia. Adiagr (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've reviewed the checkuser results, and I see that on August 3 at 12:19 this account edited Invading the Sacred; shortly thereafter, the account User:Theguide1978 was created on the same IP, and that account has done nothing but edit that same article. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:47, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adiagr —SpacemanSpiff 17:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I request once again to check ip addresses and other details. This is a completely baseless charge. The investigation tab provided above is unclear. I once again contest against this blatant one sided action. I even had strong argument with user searchpow on talk page of Invading the Sacred. This action is laughable. Adiagr (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

This is what I think he was pointing you at. Note that the Checkuser result came back Likely. Checkuser results like that are going to be very difficult to contest. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I saw the link indicated by Jeremy. I believe that admins should go through the talk page of "Invading the Sacred", particularly because the disputes on editing were resolved after 26th July. As a contributing editor to this article, I would like to repeat what I said on talk Page: Please go a bit deep before you pronounce judgements and block accounts and do not rely completely on software. The book is forthright and does attack an established system. As such its summary will have to be true to this spirit. After the talk an agreement was reached, and I have been giving due references/citations etc. as advised. I urge editors to go through the articles and compare it with the book. I also request admins to compare articles after the talk discussions and the ones written prior to that. I request that at least one of the deciding administrators takes some time to know a bit more about the book. The book is available as a free download. Compare section III that I have written and then decide. Adiagr (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

I'm commenting out the extra unblock requests. You don't need to make a new request just to reply to other users on this page. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two points. Were the changes/edits made by "theguide1978" user were from the same ip address as mine? Secondly, were all the user ids that have been blocked as sockpuppets also created from my id? What about their changes and edits. Were they also done from my ip address? Please verify whether they are independent users. [User:Adiagr|Adiagr]] (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Checkusers do not reveal information that may implicate privacy publicly, and this includes what you're asking for. Also, Checkuser looks at more than just IPs. I will say nothing beyond that. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 09:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BARNStars

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for contributing to Invading the Sacred DharmoRakshati (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]