User talk:DharmoRakshati

Rajiv Malhotra

For a new user, you seem to be well-acquainted with Wiki-policies. Now take the next step, follow those policies, and use the talkpage, instead of censoring relevant information. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DharmoRakshati, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DharmoRakshati! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DharmoRakshati reported by User:Ogress (Result: ). Thank you. Ogress _smash! 21:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Making Rajiv sound like a loon

Is your goal to make Rajiv sound like a loon?VictoriaGrayson^Talk 15:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I do that? He's just asserting his point. DharmoRakshati (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Supercomputing in India page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Anupam page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DharmoRakshati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not using multiple accounts. Does admins know about NATs? DharmoRakshati (talk) 10:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the high overlap of editing topics along with the checkuser evidence, this is at the very least WP:MEATPUPPETRY, if not socking. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.