User talk:Threemonths

Threemonths, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Threemonths!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Toro y Moi - Samantha.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Toro y Moi - Samantha.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Panda Bear - Person Pitch1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Panda Bear - Person Pitch1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Blake picture

Your picture is more recent, yes...which is why I included it at the bottom of his biography, lined up with recent years. But as a lead picture, it was very difficult to even tell it was Blake for basic identification purposes, and as for the other picture being "old"....it was taken in 2013, which was two years ago. That's hardly problematic, it's certainly not as if Blake has drastically changed his appearance or aged two decades in that time. It's simply a more appropriate picture, and I suggest you return it and leave your picture toward the bottom, corresponding with the sections on his recent career.GentleCollapse16 (talk) 08:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rklawton (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:Contributor321. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 21:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am truly sorry. I had no idea that this was considered rallying. I am reverting my edits to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. Threemonths (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand...

WP:PROMO and WP:WEIGHT. Wikipedia is not an advertisement for your college, and people from the college do not control the content in the article. Do not make the logo larger again. BMK (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colleges and universities are not immune from the requirements of PROMO. When the seal is too large, it's effectively an advertisement for the college. Please read and understand WP:Edit warring and WP:BRD and stop reverting mu justifiable adjustment of the size of the seal on Connecticut College. If you continue to think that the seals should be huge, the place to go is the article talk page, and make your arguments there. IN the meantime, please stop reverting, you're still a new editor, and getting into numerous instances of trouble right at the beginning is not a good thing. BMK (talk) 03:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes

If you keep making mistakes - and learning from them as I see you are doing here - you are going to be an AWESOME editor. Rklawton (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I saw many university wiki pages and they all had the linked text, so I just ran with it. I've been trying to learn Wikipedia and learning from my mistakes has actually been the most helpful. I've been updating Seals for university wiki pages that either don't have one or have a low resolution seal because I believe people visit Wikipedia more often than the colleges' websites so it's best to make it look nice, like album covers or film posters for their respective wiki pages. Once again, thanks a lot for your edifying observations on my edits! Threemonths (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We're not here to be a substitute for college websites, we are an encyclopedia - please start thinking of us in that way. BMK (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in my response did I assert that I believed Wikipedia to be a substitute to university websites. I was SOLELY referring to the seals of universities, which are usually not on college webpages anyways. All I have been editing are the seals. This non sequitur that I do not act as if Wikipedia is an encyclopedia is untenable and childish for someone of your age. Threemonths (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]