Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 9

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< 8 December	10 December >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cocco. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunjō no Tani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Does not meet the guidelines of Notability of Recordings nor does it show any indication of importance. QuartzReload (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cocco, no claim to notability, no independent notability. Note, this is actually the first discussion of this article, as the nominator apparently created the first page at 00:29, 9 December 2015, and this page four minutes later. Article has existed since 2009 when apparently it was "news". WP:NOTNEWS. --Bejnar (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cocco - Concur with assessment this article fails WP:N. Jun Kayama 16:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, that was my error. Apologies for that. Please note that this is the only intended nomination of the page by me. QuartzReload (talk) 22:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Just a heads up - I've closed the other AFD as was set up wrong - As noted above this discussion should be counted as the first, Technically the 1st AFD page should be deleted, Then this should be moved to the first AFD and then this page(redirect) should be deleted........ Yeah It's too much fucking around! .. so to save time and to make life easier we'll just imagine this is the first AFD . –Davey2010^Talk 02:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.