User talk:Barek
![]() |
Barek is tired of wikidrama, and has chosen to spend more time in the real world; but may still wander back online occasionally. During this time, replies to queries may be greatly delayed. |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Barek. |
My talk page archives![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Florida libraries
Thanks for trimming the library cruft at Charlotte County, Florida. Could you take a look at this user's similar edits and advise if they need trimming as well? Thanks much. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 08:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Also please note this edit. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 09:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed the other articles; I had thought it was just that one article so was just going to do an RFC on the talk page. Seeing as it's more widespread, I'm now thinking it may be better to start a discussion at WP:ANI. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
I write this in this way on page 2015 in film because if you look at all previous pages (see List of years in film) such us about years in films 2014 in film 2013 in film 2012 in film e.t.c. are written in this way. Why all this pages are written in this way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.86.255.196 (talk) 19:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- 2.86.255.196 As you have been told three times now, the place for you to discuss this is at ANI. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Request
Rev-del requested on this . Sorry, couldn't find a currently logged on admin from the rev-del list. Meters (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- thanks for the quick response. Meters (talk) 23:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Alternative routes
Alternate locations are being discussed:
"Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Botswana and India" http://www.businessinsider.sg/hyperloop-says-the-valley-is-just-talk-2015-10/#.VmjaIuJ-5yg
"China is considering plans to develop an ultra-high-speed hyperloop link between Beijing and Shanghai." http://www.traveldailymedia.com/226932/china-mulls-hyperloop-link-for-beijing-shanghai/
Where should this content be inserted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.189.108 (talk) 01:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs on the article talk page, not on my talk page. That said, the main statement of value from the first articles is "We think the first Hyperloop will be built in a country where there’s a lack of infrastructure and less regulation", as the other countries are only mentioned in passing without so much as a hint to the cities served, and no clarification of if there are discussions taking place or if they were just mentioned off the top of his head as potential places they might contact at some point. The second article justifies mentioning China in the article, as it confirms the cities being proposed as well as specifically stating that discussions are underway.
- I think the best places to mention these would be in the section Political and economic considerations - as it most directly relates to that subject header. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Template problem
It would be nice if you could comment here. 80.132.94.160 (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
User:129.244.179.94
Hello Barek, Many thanks for your comments to the above unregistered IP regarding the vandalism to the Voyager Golden Record article. Like yourself, I have no idea how the warning went to the wrong IP, unless the alterations and warning went out at exactly the same time. I can only apologise if this happened. However, there is no excuse for the IP's name calling. Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Editing
About the pages I have discussed this, but until now no one showed interestUser talk:2.86.255.196