Jump to content

User talk:Me-123567-Me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 32.218.152.138 (talk) at 21:02, 3 January 2016 (Abuse of warning templates: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Me-123567-Me, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  GreenJoe 19:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Provincial Credit Union

Hello Me-123567-Me,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Provincial Credit Union for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. BU Rob13 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Deposit Guarantee Corporation of Manitoba, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://accesscu.ca/personal/investing/depositguaranteeprotection.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your stub articles

I'll echo what was said on AN/I - since each of your articles only cites a single primary source, they are extremely unlikely to survive an AfD discussion; they might not even pass a speedy deletion request, as there's no strong assertion of notability. I suggest that if you want your articles to survive, that you do a bit of research and find citations from third-party WP:Reliable sources which speak to the notability of the organizations. Best, BMK (talk) 21:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see one of your articles has already been speedy-deleted, for exactly the reason I suggested. You had best start expanding and referencing your articles PDQ. BMK (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Roku#Wrap-up

@Me-123567-Me: You participated earlier in the discussion over the Mdann52's drive-by-deletions of a useful comparison table and other content from the Roku page. A wrap-up to that is nearing an end, can you add your voice there? EnTerr (talk) 22:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NationBuilder

A tag has been placed on NationBuilder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. ... Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Me, replied with an additional source. Not appropriate for speedy, please nominate for wp:afd if you'd like to see it removed. ∴ here…♠ 03:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Me, Please restore the article I contested and send through the proper AfD process. Thank you! here 01:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Me-123567-Me!

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Happy New Year, Me-123567-Me!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Notability of Green Parties?

Hi there, I noticed that you've tagged the Green Party of New Jersey and a number of articles about other state and provincial green parties with the notability tag. Can you explain this? --TM 00:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Me-123567-Me!

Templates

Hello, Me-123567-Me, welcome to Wikipedia. Please take some thought before posting templates on people. Don't forget you are responsible for what a template says, if you are the one posting it — for everything it says. It's misuse of Twinkle to post a template containing text like "please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines" and mention of "our welcome page" to a highly experienced user like Collect. I'm surprised Collect doesn't sound more annoyed than he does. Until you have become more used to the manners here, I highly recommend you to communicate in your own words only — humanspeak, not templatespeak — and, if you have a complaint or a question, to be informative and specific . "Unconstructive" is a pretty useless comment on Collect's edit. Bishonen | talk 22:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Smiles go for miles!

What a kind way to put it, so sorry the link is dead. Looking forward to seeing where it will direct us in the future. Happy New Year. Lotje (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party deletions

Why are you nominating all the US Green Parties for deletion? Some of the articles are indeed pretty thin, but the Green Party of New Jersey has reliable sources. I'm concerned about the single focus of your deletions. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of warning templates

Information icon Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to 32.218.152.138. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. 32.218.152.138 (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]