User talk:KrazyKlimber

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Where does it say that I have a conflict of interest? Why would you think that? I have no idea what you are talking about. Ylevental (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are a personal friend of the subject. That's COI. KrazyKlimber (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you think that? Instead of reverting the article, edit it as you would any other article, or I will settle this with the admins. Ylevental (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and talk to the admins. You are a personal friend of Mitchell's and I can prove it. Stop editing the article per COI. KrazyKlimber (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't post personal information about other editors that they have not voluntarily revealed. This is a form of harassment. You will be blocked if you do it again. — Earwig ^talk 22:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KrazyKlimber, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KrazyKlimber! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 16:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

KrazyKlimber (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An error has been made assuming that my account is a single purpose account. I barely had a chance to establish myself and no one looked at my entire list of edits. The personal attack/harassment accusation I reject on the grounds that I was pursuing a COI issue and I did try to avoid crossing the line once it was brought to my attention. That as I said to Earwig was going to be hard but I made the commitment. I've been offline since because real life intervened as it does from time to time, and I assume that was why my account was judged as single purpose. It's not. I haven't been given the chance to participate more widely as was my intention from the beginning. I ask that WP:NEWBIE be applied and that my account be unblocked as a premature act. I might not like the AfD decision but I have to accept it per WP:CONSENSUS. The most important thing is that the COI issue has been settled and we can all move on from this. I have other unrelated edits I wish to do and I can not do that blocked. KrazyKlimber (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=An error has been made assuming that my account is a single purpose account. I barely had a chance to establish myself and no one looked at my entire list of edits. The personal attack/harassment accusation I reject on the grounds that I was pursuing a COI issue and I did try to avoid crossing the line once it was brought to my attention. That as I said to Earwig was going to be hard but I made the commitment. I've been offline since because real life intervened as it does from time to time, and I assume that was why my account was judged as single purpose. It's not. I haven't been given the chance to participate more widely as was my intention from the beginning. I ask that [[WP:NEWBIE]] be applied and that my account be unblocked as a premature act. I might not like the AfD decision but I have to accept it per [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. The most important thing is that the COI issue has been settled and we can all move on from this. I have other unrelated edits I wish to do and I can not do that blocked. [[User:KrazyKlimber|KrazyKlimber]] ([[User talk:KrazyKlimber#top|talk]]) 03:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=An error has been made assuming that my account is a single purpose account. I barely had a chance to establish myself and no one looked at my entire list of edits. The personal attack/harassment accusation I reject on the grounds that I was pursuing a COI issue and I did try to avoid crossing the line once it was brought to my attention. That as I said to Earwig was going to be hard but I made the commitment. I've been offline since because real life intervened as it does from time to time, and I assume that was why my account was judged as single purpose. It's not. I haven't been given the chance to participate more widely as was my intention from the beginning. I ask that [[WP:NEWBIE]] be applied and that my account be unblocked as a premature act. I might not like the AfD decision but I have to accept it per [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. The most important thing is that the COI issue has been settled and we can all move on from this. I have other unrelated edits I wish to do and I can not do that blocked. [[User:KrazyKlimber|KrazyKlimber]] ([[User talk:KrazyKlimber#top|talk]]) 03:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=An error has been made assuming that my account is a single purpose account. I barely had a chance to establish myself and no one looked at my entire list of edits. The personal attack/harassment accusation I reject on the grounds that I was pursuing a COI issue and I did try to avoid crossing the line once it was brought to my attention. That as I said to Earwig was going to be hard but I made the commitment. I've been offline since because real life intervened as it does from time to time, and I assume that was why my account was judged as single purpose. It's not. I haven't been given the chance to participate more widely as was my intention from the beginning. I ask that [[WP:NEWBIE]] be applied and that my account be unblocked as a premature act. I might not like the AfD decision but I have to accept it per [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. The most important thing is that the COI issue has been settled and we can all move on from this. I have other unrelated edits I wish to do and I can not do that blocked. [[User:KrazyKlimber|KrazyKlimber]] ([[User talk:KrazyKlimber#top|talk]]) 03:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}