User talk:Ponyo

Due to personal issues, Ponyo will be away from Wikipedia for an undefined period of time.

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message.

If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it.

If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist.

Sock alert

Hi, I see that you've squashed some socks of User:Jonjon893 in the past. Here's his latest: Special:Contributions/Jonathan_Sydel --SubSeven (talk) 05:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed and blocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kartiktiwary/Archive

Hi Ponyo. I think its possible that the recently created Divya Thaakur might be a Kartiktiwary sock based upon their style of edits and the article's they've been editing. In particular, the edits made at File:SiyaKeRam.jpg and File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg might be an attempt to add File:Siya and Ram.jpg which you deleted per WP:G5 last month. There's also this edit made by an IP not too long after the infobox image change which seems a little unusual for the first edit of an IP without any connection at all to the other accounts. Anyway, I opened an FFD at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 9#File:Siya Ke Ram.jpg to discuss the two images, but Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kartiktiwary/Archive has been archived so I'm not sure if it's OK to post my WP:DUCK concerns on the SPI page. What is generally done in a case such as this? -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In order to open a new investigation when an SPI has been archived, follow the instructions in the drop down section titled "How to open an investigation" (where you pretty much just enter the sockmaster's name i.e. Kartiktiwary, hit "submit" and add your evidence.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wish you well

Dear Ponyo,

I hope you and your family are doing well. And I hope to see you back soon 'cause we really miss you here "the best administrator ever". Take care. (Mona778 (talk) 02:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

That's very kind, thank you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Sock

Hi there Ponyo, I noticed this account - User:Alvi34, similar to User:Alvi50 you blocked previously. Just flagging it's highly likely a sock as they edit similar pages. CDRL102 (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@CDRL102: Ponyo's not available. I blocked the account. Thanks for the heads up.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Thanks for keeping an eye on the place, you're a star. I expect to be "back" (in some form or another) on Monday.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tough sailor ouch (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack.

I merely saw an article in today's newspaper and saw there was no wikipedia article. Now someone says I am a sock from someone who edited that deleted article TWO years ago. For crying out loud, the newspaper is read by millions of people. If you are a bully who believes in being like the NSA, do it. If you are for encouraging reader edits, then be nice not not a private CIA.

19:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)