Jump to content

Talk:Stanley Hooker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2.31.130.71 (talk) at 20:47, 11 February 2016 (→‎Atwood on Meredith: Typos). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAviation: Biography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Stanley Hooker video

There's an interesting video featuring Stanley Hooker talking about his engine work on YouTube here: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Atwood on Meredith

Even supposing that Atwood did say what he is reported in the Article to have said about the effect of the Meredith Effect on the performance of the Mustang, and that a citation can be supplied, it would seem appropriate for the statement to be added here: John Leland Atwood and here: P-51 Mustang and not in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.153.197 (talk) 06:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your comment and have removed the following from the paragraph about the Merlin
"This variant of the Merlin was also to become the powerplant of the North American P-51 Mustang, and its efficiency enabled the Mustang to fly all the way to Berlin, attack the defending German fighters, and return home; this engine and the laminar flow wing were considered the secrets of the Mustang's success. Lee Atwood of North American Aviation however, made it clear[1] that the Meredith Effect had more influence on the performance of the Mustang than its laminar flow wing. The Meredith Effect used the heat of the engine to produce thrust through its sophisticated radiator system."
However, I accept that this might be a bit over zealous but leave it to others to decide if details about the Mustang need to be reincorporated.

KreyszigB (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. It's not Hooker, or about Hooker, but is about both the other two, which is where it belongs. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Mustang was designed in 1940 when the only Spitfire Atwood would have heard of was the Spitfire Mk Ia. The Spitfire XIX was Griffon-powered and didn't fly until at least 1943-44. The Mk XIV and later Griffon-engined Spitfires like the XIX would all do about 450 mph in S Ratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.130.71 (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]