User talk:Müdigkeit

Welcome!

Hello, Müdigkeit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja-Square

I normally only salt after three recreations, but I've done so here after two because I've also indefinitely blocked the creator of the second version for a violation of our user name policy. The original creator may or may not be the same person, but there is no overlap at all between their edits, so no grounds for action at present. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the article(that was the talk page) was already created four times, and had been salted.--Müdigkeit (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket guidelines

I note that you've made a number of edits since those posts, but you haven't yet entered the discussion at WT:CRICKET to clarify those guidelines. Trusting this is just an omission, I figured on dropping a reminder. Ravenswing 13:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it, drop it already!

Hey Müdigkeit, stop harassing people with your crap! Drop it already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.51.95.188 (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders

No consensus on his religion[1] clearly goes back to the status quo before the edit warriors showed up, which was inclusion. See for example [2] -- Kendrick7^talk 19:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. Consensus can change, and it even can change that way that there is no longer one(in this case, for keeping it). And if there is no consensus, WP:ONUS applies, User:Kendrick7.--Müdigkeit (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, there doesn't appear to be a consensus; WP:PRESERVE applies. :) -- Kendrick7^talk 20:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kendrick7: Can you tell me why WP:Preserve applies? WP:Preserve does not include material that should not be in the article at all, and there is no consensus yet for keeping or removal, which means, per WP:ONUS, and WP:BLP, that the needed consensus to keep something in the article hasn't been reached- which means removal. --Müdigkeit (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Christian Network(Christian Broadcasting Network)

Hi, Regarding the GCN,

1. Yonhap News is mainstream news agency and the source is reliable.

  http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=103&oid=001&aid=0000763412

2. GCN has its stations in South Korea and US

http://www.gcntv.us/news/news_view.asp?bbs_num=35

3. Its programs are aired through WEBR-CD in New York City.

4. It has partnership with Trinity Broadcasting Network Russia, Enlace etc.

I think the article needs to be in the Wikipedia.