Talk:Trellix

Computer Security: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Companies Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Primary source

This article makes a lot of "claims" that cite only the company blog or a press release. While this kind of source is not forbidden, the use here is dubious and seems like an advertisement. The extractable value of a press release or blog is often also verifiable by a third party. ForrestLyle (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All three tags that were added in 2014 are no longer valid. The whole article seems dated, but it does not look a press release. The article is neutral and the references are secondary and independent, so I will remove the tags if there's no objection. Tdk408 (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:DETAG, after publishing a notice on this talk page, I have removed three tags which no longer apply. I removed the third-party, primary sources, and advert tags, which are a year old and are no longer applicable. Tdk408 (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an advertisement

This article is in dire need of being rewritten so it focuses in telling what does Fireeye products do, instead of just stating how cool their technology is.

I landed here trying to know more about these devices but I got nothing.

Article looks like an advertisement

This article reads like an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.13.209 (talk) 04:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notoriety

This article has a citation to an article in ComputerWorld. I consider this to be a reliabe source under WP:RS and I'm being bold and removing the {{Importance}} tag. OlYeller^Talktome 12:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is a sales brochure, not an encyclopedia entry

try to find out what they do. all you'll get is lists of crappy "cool product" awards they won or bought. ffs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.168.139 (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that this is a sales brochure

I came here to try and figure out what exactly they do as their site was filled with "APT" etc. Turns out this is even less helpful. Looks like it was written by FireEye's marketing team Orion159753 (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Third-party and Primary Sources tags

The Third-party and Primary Sources tags are no longer appropriate. Currently, 9 out of 11 references are neutral, independent sources. If there is no objection, I'll detag per WP:DETAG. Tdk408 (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Detagging done. The article no longer reads like advertising copy, and the sources are independent and neutral. Tdk408 (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expand acronym "MPS"

Currently the article repeatedly uses the acronym "MPS" without defining it. Someone who knows, please fix, thanks. 129.219.155.89 (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I improve this article?

I'm a FireEye employee (engineer), but I'd like to spend a little time fleshing out this article so it has better/more useful information, 3rd party citations, maintains NPOV, and doesn't seem so "salesy". Would this be against Wikipedia etiquette? Jargoon (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are in any doubt if your edits are really NPOV then you can always post them here in the talk page first. Given no-one else answered your question in 3 months I think it's probably OK. 15.195.185.84 (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]