Talk:Alcopop

Food and drink C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spirits Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

removed

removed from article: "Remarkably, other sweet, alcoholic beverages that had been around for years escaped this madness."

What distinguishes alcopops from older beverages is the way they have been surreptitiously marketed toward teenagers. not that teen drinking is a new problem -- but in my day gin etc tasted so damn foul it took a really determined effort to get wasted ... ;-) -- Tarquin 12:38 Aug 20, 2002 (PDT)

alcopop v malternative

I'm not sure whether "alcopop" is cutsier than the US term "malternative," but the latter seems more self-consciously marketese. --Calieber 16:21, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)

I'm from the US , and I've never heard the term "alcopop" or "malternative" ever in my life. I guess it's a GB thing, and frankly the article should reflect that. In my opinion, this article doesn't really warrant inclusion in the Alcoholic Beverage template as it is a limited regional word. Secondly, it sounds like something MADD would make up while screaming about the children confused by this horrible evil.130.13.20.67 (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

random links

Do we really need all of the random links to unrelated pages, such as Sweet, Bottles, Germany, United Kingdom? I thinks these links are overkill. Just because it can be linked to, doesn't mean it should. --Andy-106 14:34, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

chick drink

Chick Drink is used in the U.S. as well (at least in New England)

German Excise Tax

The tax Germany has put on coolers seems more aimed at protecting thier beer industry than discouraging underage drinking.

Can the tax possibly be 0.80 or 0.90 euros per bottle? Beer costs on average 0.70 to 0.80 euros per half-liter bottle. I don't believe the alcopops cost much more than a euro per bottle. Without a citation, this tax figure seems suspect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.64.92.82 (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zima

You know, I remember Hooch (I think you can still get it) and Two Dogs, but I can't honestly recall ever hearing of a drink called "Zima"! Gin Zing, now that stuff was nice. Like ginger beer :) IainP [[User_talk:IainP|(talk)]] 12:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC) (sorry about dodgy signature... apparently it's a system problem)[reply]

Zima is very much a U.S. phenomenon. Until a few years ago they were advertising the hell out of that swill. I see it in any alcohol-selling establishment. You can call me Al 21:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's something that struck me about this article; I see "alcopop" (the term, as such) as pretty much a UK phenomenon. After all the U.S. has had Boone's Farm since at least the 1970s and never mentioned the genre as a fad. I wonder if any U.S.-only drinks even qualify for this article. Themadchopper 05:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-alcohol groups in the US, such as The Center for Science in the Public Interest, also use the term "alcopops." See, for example, Alcopops, Calories & Weight Gain.David Justin 00:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alcopop

Where is the name Alcopop used? It's not a common term in Australia. Ozdaren 04:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly in the UK. Nunquam Dormio 20:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common term in Ireland also. Everytime 03:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the United States, "alcopop" is a term of derision used by anti-alcohol activists. The industry does not use that term because it conflates the ideas of "alcoholic beverage" and "soda pop" in a potentially confusing way which may make those products more appealing to under-age youth. By popularizing the term, anti-alcohol activists accomplish what they falsely accuse the beverage alcohol industry of doing. I would argue that the very use of the term is in violation of Wikipedia neutrality policies, as it is a prejudicial, politically-loaded term.Cowdery (talk) 01:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should be removed from the article. The phrase "anti-alcohol activists accomplish what they falsely accuse the beverage alcohol industry of doing." can hardly be called neutral IMHO Kevertje (talk) 19:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough on the second sentence, but the article should make clear that this is not an industry term, hence the vagueness of its definition, and the fact that the type of beverage being described varies significantly by country. It is used primarily by anti-alcohol activists and occasionally by neutral commentators. The fact that some jurisdictions, including my state of Illinois in the United States, have used it in legislation means that it has as least some official standing. This entry could do a lot better job. It should perhaps be noted that, in the United States, at least, this term is almost never used by the consumers of the product. No one walks into a bar and asks, "what alcopops do you have?" Cowdery (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely not a term widely used anywhere outside Europe. For this reason perhaps the first lines should reflect this. In Australia its industry term is "pre-mixed".Wampusaust 05:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article really needs to be split into separate sections covering usage in North America, the UK / Ireland and Australia / NZ. The US beer based drinks are unique to that region and only exist because of the bizarre US post-prohibition liquor laws. Elsewhere alcopops are universally made with industrial ethanol because that's the cheapest way tho make them. The list of brands is pointless and misleading because they mean different things in different markets. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above paragraph is true, though I would add that spirits-based ready-to-drink products also exist in the United States but because of the regulatory pecularities, their footprint in the marketplace is tiny compared to flavored malt beverages. I think this whole entry should be changed to reflect the fact that alcopop is a vague and deliberately prejudicial term that can refer to a wide range of very different beverages. Cowdery (talk) 01:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this should just be a disambiguation page.Cowdery (talk) 08:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generally these drinks are colloquially referred to as 'coolers' in Western Canada. I've never heard any term at all used in marketing materials. I've certainly never heard the term Alcopop. I agree with the above posters, the introduction to this article needs to reflect that this is UK- or euro-centric. Adding links to dag pages for other common terms is probably useful too.

The term only started being used in Australia when they bought in the new taxes. I believe it was used to make the law seem "fresh" as it is aimed at young people. For some reason the term "Pre-mixed drinks" doesn't have good ring to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.127.145 (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Alcopop' is certianly commonly used by the Australian news media these days. Format (talk) 07:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chart

what's the deal with the chart? it doesnt make any sense to my little mind. Skhatri2005 07:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should fix it up, have headings and what not. Though I would imagine it is pretty obvious exactly what it means... 202.10.86.59 14:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to be a bother, but what's the point of the chart. it's a good concept but I dont know how complete it is. first you have a large list of malternatives, then theres this chart that has only some of them on it. i'm just wondering the need for it, that's all. no bad faith here. cheersSkhatri2005 09:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutly none taken at all. And you are right, it is not very complete. I have slowly been filling it out, but I have not even heard of some of the drinks mentioned. I don't want to add drinks and not have any information on thim. IF the general concensus is that the diagram shall go, the diagram shall go 202.10.86.59 07:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The chart is overkill. A list of products would be sufficient, with notations for ones that are especially unusual or significant. Thetrick 20:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Premium Packaged Spirits

The PPS article definately should be merged with this one if it is nothing more than a different marketing term for the range of products. Thetrick 20:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woody's?

Anyone got anything on "Woody's"? Wasn't that the drink that started off the alcopop craze in the UK and Ireland?

History

These drinks have been around in Australia since the 1970s, first manufactured as UDL (United Distillers Ltd) and are collectively known as RTDs (Ready To Drink). The term alcopop is a British word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phanto282 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As noted elsewhere, in the United States these products are flavored malt beverages, whose prototype is Zima, but the phenomenon can also be traced to a Miller product called "clear beer," (brand name Miller Clear) which was produced and test marketed in 1993.Cowdery (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what's your point? The "phenomenon" (hardly rocket surgery to put a spirit with a soft drink) has been around since the 1970s in Australia. They have nothing to do with flavoured malt beverages or beer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.191.166 (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"late 1980s" does not seem right. We were drinking flavored malt liquor that came in 4 packs in California back in the early 1970's. They came in small bottles packaged in 4 packs and had cute names and various sweet flavors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.2.221.134 (talk) 10:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CONFLICTING

"California's state assembly recently passed AB 346, a bill which requires manufacturers of alcopops to carry a 'warning' label stating "ATTENTION: THIS DRINK CONTAINS ALCOHOL." [8] This bill has been praised by groups advocating against consumption of alcohol by minors[9], since these drinks are favored by young people due to their flavor and alcohol content."

I don't know... these two sentances don't seem to fit. Minors like the drink for its flavour and alcohol content, and the warning label states that it contains alcohol. It's almost additional advertising. You could almost replace "since" with "dispite the fact" and it would be just as correct. I just believe some minor clarification is required here. Do we really need to state here why the drinks are enjoyed by minors? 202.10.86.59 (talk) 15:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That second phrase confused me also. "Since these drinks are favored by young people" seems to be neither neutral nor sourced, given that sources 8 and 9 a couple sections back apparently state they're not marketed towards a younger crowd, they're too sweet to drink very many, and most importantly, older people drink them more. I'm going to add a citation needed to that phrase, for the reasons I stated here. 74.181.90.193 (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alcopops has incorrect entries

Am I misunderstanding the definition of Alcopop or are some of the things in the list of examples wrong?

Skyy Vodka is just a hard liquor, isn't it?

And doesn't it have to be sold pre-mixed to count? Or do those whiskeys and cokes and the gin and tonic count too? Is there any distinction between "Alcopop" and simply "Cocktail"? Mbarbier (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the United States, alcopop is a term primarily used by neo-prohibitionists to refer to sweet, fruity, flavored malt beverages, which they believe are masquerading as soft drinks to entice underage drinkers. Their target most recently is alcoholic energy drinks such as Sparks and Tilt, which they also consider alcopops. The term appears in statutes on the books in Illinois and other states so defined, but some commentators lump in sprits-based pre-mixed cocktails too, but they are not alcopops according to the statutory definition, and are not very significant in the marketplace. In the United States, products such as Smirnoff Ice and Jack Daniel's Black Jack Cola are flavored malt beverages and contain no vodka nor whiskey.Cowdery (talk)

Category merge

Now that the Alcopop and PPS articles have been merged, I suggest that Category:Alcopop and Category:Premixed and RTD alcoholic beverages be merged. I have no preference as to which survives, though retaining Alcopop would make more sense. --Thetrick (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other names

Locally this is known as "bitchbeer", but I'm not sure how to include that in the article. Anyone? - 38.100.218.55 (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. We all call it bitch beer here in Texas. 74.196.43.27 (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prominence of term origin

The term is only used by people and organisations that want to ban or restrict them, why should that not be prominent? It's not biased; it's fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.50.4.4 (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is demonstrably untrue; "alcopop" is used all the time by news organizations not known to be infiltrated by temperance advocates (385 on Google News in the last month alone,) the second Google hit for "alcopop" is "a celebration of the success of these sugary alcoholic drinks, from the viewpoint not of the big breweries but of a delighted consumer," etc. It is true that the alcohol industry regards "alcopop" as a problematic, pejorative term, and it may even be true that the prevalence of the term in the mainstream is a result of effective propaganda by anti-alcohol crusaders. However, it is not for Wikipedia to say whether a given term is appropriate or inappropriate, just to report on the opinions of others. The previous structure of the article, to which you have reverted, is clearly designed to favour a position of "don't call them alcopops, alcopops is a bad word, the nasty temperance people are behind it." This is clearly not neutral presentation of fact and it borders on original synthesis in that it ties together various sources to introduce an "alcopop = bad word" narrative that appears not to be supported directly by the individual sources. <eleland/talkedits> 00:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No that statement is NOT untrue. In the article itself I wrote "and the media that report them" so your contention of its use in media is specious. The term was derived by "anti-alcohol crusaders" as you called them and should be defined as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.50.4.4 (talk) 18:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so it was in my explanation for the inclusion, not the article, that I wrote of the media, but it's still a specious arguement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.50.4.4 (talk) 18:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whiskeys

Why are whiskeys on the table? Whiskeys are not alcopops, and they're a traditional hard drink... Jack Daniels is not a malternative. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Daniels is indeed, not a malternative. However, this page deals with alcopops, which is a superset of malternatices. Jack Daniels do release an RTD drink called Jack Daniels and X, where X is coke, dry and lemonaide. In contexts where RTDs are common, "6 JD cans" would almost always mean "6 cans of Jack Daniels and coke". The chart has a "base" column which deals with the hard liquor used to make the RTD (sometimes of the same name). If this could be made clearer in the article, feel free to fix it. 203.122.97.43 (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you just typed, even less than what is written in the article about it. 74.196.43.27 (talk) 06:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in the Base column of the table is an alcopop. What makes it part of the table is that combining it with mixers makes an alcopop. Gregory.currie (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Garage brand visual removal request

On the link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcopop

a visual of a product Garage is shown: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Garage_Hard_Lemonade.jpg

On behalf of Carlsberg Breweries A/S, owner of the garage brand as shown, I request the removal of the image and reference to teh brand on the entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcopop.

Please confirm the removal.

Niels Lund-Johansen Director, Head of IP Carlsberg Breweries A/S Ny Carlsberg Vej 100 1799 Copenhagen, Denmark niels.lund.johansen@carlsberg.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by NielsLJ (talk • contribs) 16:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV Page name

Alcopop is a perjorative term used by anti-alcohol activists, as acknowledged in the article's lead. This article should be moved to a neutral title, any suggestions? Skrelk (talk) 15:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. I have never heard the term "alcopop" used by anyone except anti-alcohol groups. It's never used to describe these types of beverages except in that context. Most people call them "wine coolers," even though many of them are malt-based. Cooler or wine cooler is NPOV, but alcopop is not. 71.71.57.15 (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the article's written in British English, Alcopop is probably the correct name - it's the common name in the UK. The industry seems to use RTD but that probably fails Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names. Wine cooler means what is described in Wine accessory#Wine coolers (although Wine cooler is a separate article about the wine-based drinks). Peter James (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Germany they introduced "Alcopop" as a label for spirit coolers although "pop" as a label for soft drinks is completely unknown in Germany. Sounds funny ... but true :-} a×p_de ^Hello! 23:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]