Jump to content

User talk:C.Fred

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.114.71.24 (talk) at 22:07, 29 July 2016 (→‎bridges). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


YouTube CD Creator

Hello, you just rolled back a change, from mark as deleted to possible advert. I was following the wiki instructions to ask for help so that it does not read like an advert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelbarry147 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Michaelbarry147: Which means you missed the instructions in the speedy deletion box that say that you may not remove a speedy delete tag from an article you created yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See TV

I thought I should let you know, I have filed SPI report here. Sro23 (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sro23: Yeah, I was already on that angle. I don't see where they are currently abusing multiple accounts or evading a block. If I missed one, though, let me know. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
==Company Profile==

[spam removed] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saaduddin2016 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 18 July 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Saaduddin2016: You can't just repeat the same material that looks like it was copied from a directory over and over. You need to discuss the situation with us and explain how this is a second company. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~hi, she just Twitted recently about being in Toronto. I would have put the reference in but Twitter links aren't accepted by Wikipedia I guess. And I'm friends with one of her friends, so I know she's in Toronto. Winston July 22~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WD82 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for adding Homework to Namrata Shrestha. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2016

Hello C.Fred, Can U say that how to upload Google file in wikipedia commons. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@सरोज उप्रेती: Short answer: don't. If you found a picture via a Google search, you probably can't upload it to Wikimedia Commons. —C.Fred (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can we Upload that photo on English Wikipedia? सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@सरोज उप्रेती: Probably not. There are pretty strict rules about non-free images. Now, that said, an image of the poster of Homework could be uploaded for the movie article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can U say the process of keeping license in movie article photo? सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need Barnstar

Hello C.Fred, I have provided you a barnstar. Now it's your turn to Provide me Barnstar. Please Give me Barnstar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by सरोज उप्रेती (talk • contribs) 05:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@सरोज उप्रेती: Barnstars are given as awards, not as items to be trading back and forth. At such time as I see you've done something that warrants one, I'll give one, but I'm not going to hand one out on demand. —C.Fred (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
…Though it seems your actions warrant an indefinite block for sockpuppetry, not a barnstar. —C.Fred (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

remote control

You are wrongfully deleting my contributions to remote control. It is sourced information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.78.47 (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's irrelevant. Your account was blocked; you may not continue to edit without logging in. —C.Fred (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is irrelevent? It made the article more accurate. I have been wrongfully shut out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.78.47 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to appeal your block. —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

S Aishwarya

Hi Reg my page ... Can you pleae let me know what more informations required

[rehash of article deleted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: You need coverage of her in independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 22:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did add other reliable external links which talks about S. Aishwarya and her performance, Some links from news papaer and reviews from blog - Please do let me know what more information is requored — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I Do have few more links to add which i'm waiting to receive from S. Aishwarya, Please do let me know if you need more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: What do you mean by receiving the links from Aishwarya? Are you editing the page at her request or on her behalf? Sounds like you might have a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you requested for more relevant resources, Have requested Aishwarya to provide more such links - Its me who wanted to create a wiki page . Please do let me know , Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: Still, you shouldn't be needing to request the information from her. If she's notable, there should be published information out there already that you can find through your own searches. —C.Fred (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I agree .. they are already available online and here are few. http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/in-the-big-league/article386947.ece http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/all-in-the-family/article4077301.ece http://tpanand.blogspot.com.ar/2015/01/saishwarya-rising-star.html https://carnatictimes.com/portfolio/the-musician-makers/ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/MS-was-simply-our-great-grandmother/articleshow/50050678.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Great-granddaughter-to-perform-with-MS-Subbalakshmis-favourite-tamburas/articleshow/42649037.cms https://indianraga.com/product/maithreem-bhajata-online-module/ As i know Aishwarya personally and its more easier to gather information and which would be more relevant. Do let me know if you need any information

Hello fred, I have added more information to the page , please do let me know, the page is yet work in progress Thanks, Good weekend - :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC) JFYI - I have also linked MS SUBBULAKSHMI (from wiki) who is the great grand mother of S.Aishwarya Thanks :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the page deleted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.18.41.214 (talk) 03:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The deleting administrator felt it was unambiguous advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lowering protection level

Hi C.Fred. I saw that you placed long-term protection on several articles such as New York State Court Officers to fight off an IP vandal who's been disruptively editing law enforcement articles. Would you mind if I remove some of these protections? I recently blocked the range that this vandal was operating from, so the disruption should be gone or greatly reduced. I'm also placing these pages on my watchlist, so if he returns with another range (I've noticed he uses one other, but very infrequently), the protection can always be restored. ~ Rob13Talk 05:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Go for it. Like I said, it just got to the point where the volume of disruption was so great that protection was in order. The rangeblocks should help there, and we can reprotect later if it's needed. —C.Fred (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our Company Profile again edited by someone else.

Hi Cfred,

As i already discussed and debate on the matter regarding "LABEL" section in our singer celebrity profiles you have deleted the section few days ago when you didn't find a suitable resource for it, now its again added don't know from whom but added you can check it in the below mentioned profile of our singer celebrity please have a look.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_to_Eye_(Taher_Shah_song)

Hence we are too much disappointed with this label "BLUE NOTES PRODUCTIONS" as we don't have any connection with this PRODUCTION HOUSE and its services and don't even know about it according to our prospective its just to cash our singer popularity and nothing kindly take a strict action against this and lock our profiles as these both songs ANGEL AND EYE TO EYE solely the property of EYE TO EYE LTD media production company that has been registered in GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and we have all the legitimate proves of both songs copyrights if required so we will show you for your record and confirmation but the company mentioned in this LABEL is totally fake and unauthentic company even don't have any record we have found in social media.

Due to this reason we again request you to kindly remove or replace this company with our legitimate company EYE TO EYE LTD and lock our all three profiles relates to our celebrity to make them secure in future the profiles are mentioned below for your record.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_to_Eye_(Taher_Shah_song)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taher_Shah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_(Taher_Shah_song)


Also share you the legitimate EYE TO EYE LTD company prove of registration in GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN DEPARTMENT.

http://www.secp.gov.pk/ns/company.asp?COMPANY_CODE=0068955&id=

I hope this is enough for you but still you required any further evidence so we will provide you the copyright copy. But delete this fake and unauthentic company from our profile.

Looking forward for your response,

Regards, Syed Affan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedAffan1 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SyedAffan1: Addressing each of your concerns in sequence:
First, I have removed the label from Eye to Eye (Taher Shah song). While your request brought the situation to my attention, that's not the reason I removed it. The reason is that no independent reliable source has been presented to show that the song was released on that label. So, it's been removed for not being verifiable. I've added the page to my watchlist, so I'll see future edits as they are made.
Second, no independent reliable source has been presented that Eye to Eye Ltd. is the label on which the song has been released, so it has not been added as the label.
Third, there has not been enough vandalism or other disruption of the articles to justify protecting any of the articles you listed.
Fourth, if you have independent reliable sources to show that Eye to Eye Ltd. holds the rights to those songs, please provide, if possible, links to where they can be verified online. Please note that, since the label is in dispute, the sources really need to be independent; the publishing company's webpage and press releases will not suffice.
Fifth, the registration of the company only shows that the company exists. It does not show what the company does, what it owns, or who it represents.
Finally, based on your repeated use of words like "we", "our singer", and "our profile", it is clear that you have a conflict of interest with these articles, and your future edits are subject to the guidelines on editing when you have a conflict of interest. In short, you should not edit the Taher Shah article, and you should not edit any articles about his songs, albums, or other media. —C.Fred (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


@C.Fred: Reply of your Message:

First of all thanks for your editing as this is my main concern to remove or replace the Label into another one.

Secondly, are you asking about the evidence of song production by EYE TO EYE LTD well there is no paper proof i have in my hand right now but i can show you the valid and authentic proof that publicly defines about the production of ANGEL Song that belongs to EYE TO EYE LTD. Please click a below mentioned link of the video and see song credits "Produced By: EYE TO EYE LTD" hence it clearly mentions about the production company, its label and so far all the work done for this song under the supervision of EYE TO EYE LTD. Have a look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoCrbuM8wmc

Further, an image of song credits is also attached with this message for your confirmation:

File:EYE TO EYE LTD-credits.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedAffan1 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SyedAffan1: As I said before, it really needs to be an independent source. The video is a self-published source, and there is the theoretical risk of the YouTube link not being authentic. That's why an independent source, with no tie to either company, is preferred. —C.Fred (talk) 00:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , reply please?

Hello C.Fred ,

I sent you message on Tafila Technical University page and waiting your reply , thank you. --Thelaststory99 (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thelaststory99: The last time I looked, I saw the tag. I didn't think further reply was needed. —C.Fred (talk) 14:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vengaboys

Hi C.Fred, I have all good reason to believe that the IP 67.140.*.*, the users Wario7936 and KimSasabone are actually all the same person, the creator of the "museum" (even stooping so low, impersonating a band member). Hence I requested a CheckUser. --ChrisHamburg (talk) 07:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisHamburg: Good call. Something felt off about the edits. I was pretty sure Wario was overlapping with the IP; I wasn't sure yet about the new account. Glad to know there's other eyes on the article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've also advised KimSasabone to contact VRT; unless they verify her identity, her username is a violation of WP:Username policy, because it's the name of a member of Vengaboys. —C.Fred (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

kimsasabone, wario7936 etc are all the same sock puppet... Vengaboys appear to have had problems with the creator of that museum before, who appears to have multiple fans working in it under a cult-like control, probably the socket puppet was some mind controlled museum follower! I have used the DMCA to take out his museum today too to give them and us a little break from his constant tactics and spam, he should have no reason to post his museum in the Vengaboys article because his website is no longer available due to a DMCA request :) (Terminated Museum) --40.142.129.233 (talk) 01:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I expected, the CheckUser investigation confirmed that the users are identical. I too believe, that the user above, 40.142.129.233, might also be involved in this, taking his choice of words into consideration. Not only is the "museum's" website closed, all its social media channels as well (tweets are protected, its facebook page is suddenly deleted). I don't know what that guy is trying to achieve, first creating sockpuppets, blaming himself for spamming, deleting references to his own website in the article and then nuking the "museum" after his scam was exposed over here... We should watch carefully. --ChrisHamburg (talk) 10:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello C. Looks like another one is at it. The talk page may need temporary protection if this keeps up. Thanks for your work with the previous troll. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 01:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: I don't like protecting user talk pages, but sometimes our hand gets forced. —C.Fred (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I completely understand. It is always a pain when a troll sits at their computer and just keeps creating new accounts when the current one gets blocked. Thanks again. MarnetteD|Talk 02:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Tiny Rascal Gang to Tiny Rascal gang

Hello C.Fred. Would you be able to allow editing of the locked Tiny Rascal Gang so a redirect can be made to Tiny Rascal gang. Page seems to cover notability criteria. Thank you.Calaka (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Calaka: I agree about the notability criteria. That's why, since the article used Tiny Rascal Gang as the name of the group, I've moved it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that C.Fred. Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 23:18, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Father Saturnino Urios University

Hi C.Fred. Would you mind taking a look at Father Saturnino Urios University. A lot of content was just added by a fairly new editor, and I can't remember if this was same stuff removed as a copyvio back in May of this year. Quite a number of revisions were deleted, but perhaps you can see them since you're an admin. FWIW, I am asking you since I saw from the article's edit history that you were involved in removing some of the copyvios back in May. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Your hunch was right: it's the same text that was revdel'ed back in May. I've deleted it and issued a warning to the account that added it. —C.Fred (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for checking. Do you think there may be a connection betweeen the accounts which added that content? Ronald Galope Barniso, who originally added it, was indef'd back at the end of May and Anitnovic2016, who re-added it with his third edit, was created shortly thereafter. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Just wanted to say thank you for your assistance regarding the Fred Lynn WP:COI! --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinions and comments

Hi there fellow Wikipedian. I came across your page in search for some outside opinions and comments regarding an ongoing dispute on the talk page for the country Eritrea [[1]]. The issue involves what naming is prefered to describe the location of the country Eritrea in the lead and the geographic section of the article. I have argumented for restoring the use of the term East Africa or Eastern Africa which used by international organization such as United Nations[1][2], African Union[3] and African development bank[4][5] to mention a few, East Africa was also recently used in the article until the other part in the dispute changed it to Horn of Africa. I have suggested using both since Eritrea is part of both East Africa and Horn of Africa, even though the latter being a less recognized region and a less used term to describe the country's location by international organizations and media. At the moment it only mentions Horn of Africa. I think it could mention both or only East Africa. It would be great to get some opinions from an experienced admin like you. Would you mind taking a look and leave some comments.. FYI ive also opened up a case on the disupte resolution notice boarding in trying to resolve this. See [[2]]. ThanksRichard0048 (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.unep.org/tunza/tunzachildren/downloads/country-Classification.pdf
  2. ^ http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm
  3. ^ http://www.afrimap.org/english/images/report/AfriMAP-AU-Guide-EN.pdf
  4. ^ http://www.afdb.org/en/countries/east-africa/
  5. ^ http://www.afdb.org/en/countries/east-africa/eritrea/eritrea-economic-outlook/

Mariah Carey

The other sites like www.imdb.com and www.famousbirthdays.com say that Mariah Carey was born in the year 1970. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamerman1990 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamerman1990: Neither of those sites is a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my edit for Mr. Faris Al-Rawi

Hello there I think my edits were reliable .If you actually checked the links for my sources you would realize that Facebook is also a reliable source as most of its information was extracted from the other websites I mentioned. You don't have to take such drastic measures and just delete my edit. I spent a lot of effort for my edit. You could have simply talked to me on my talk page about the matter before undoing my edit. I am well aware of Wikipedia's policy pertain to articles about living people and I have given adequate information and I stated my sources. So I request that you think of your actions and know how other people feel when just want to make a Wikipedia Article better but was undone by people like you.😒 

Pnmforlife (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pnmforlife: You might want to check the article history again. I didn't revert your edit. What I did was welcome you with some pointers to guidance on things like reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 23:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bridges

Why are you removing history for tied arch bridges? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.71.24 (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because blocked users may not edit. It's clear that the person currently using that IP was previously blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made one edit. What are you talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.71.24 (talk) 22:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history of Tied-arch bridge speaks for itself. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to re-add useful information that has been removed. I have never been blocked. The fact that this information has been added before and the history shows it does not mean that this information should forever be blocked from entering Wikipedia. That is misleading and unjust.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:C.Fred&oldid=732138485"