Talk:Krasnoyarsk

Russia: Human geography Start‑class Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Transliteration

Is it better Krasnojarsk or Krasnoyarsk? Basilicofresco (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, "Krasnoyarsk", but it may be different depending on what you are referring to. Please see WP:RUS for details. If after reviewing it you still have questions, feel free to post them here or contact me directly. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sun in Pictures

It would be nice if you add some pictures with sun, because from May to September weather is good with high temperatures so there must be a lot of sunny days.

Good idea. I'll add some soon. Efenstor (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The backbone of the Russian Federation

Krasnoyarsk, placed exactly in the middle of the Russian Federation, halfway between Moscow and Vladivostok looks like the backbone of the Russian Federation.--88.18.149.23 (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you look hard enough and squint just right, it also looks like a trout. Unfortunately, that fact is also irrelevant to the article :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:13, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Spelling

The picture should say "An historic house" rather than "A historic house"... I just don't know how to change it. Havoc21 (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the "H" in this case was silent, it would make sense. However, the "H" in "historic" is not. Verified Cactus (talk) 19:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it shouldn't. "H" is neither a vowel nor silent, nor are we living in the 19th century :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 3, 2014; 13:10 (UTC)

The answer is "it could". The above response has succeeded in patronising Havoc21 and insulting English people like me who still use the traditional rule that the indefinite article is "an" before a word beginning with an aspirated "h" when the accent is on the second syllable of the word. So, "an historic house..." but "a history teacher...". Of course, many people no longer follow this rule, but consigning those who to the 19th Century is offensive. 122.106.177.188 (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was going more for "ironic" rather than "patronizing", but I realize that in writing the line between the two may seem blurred. Apologies if you thought it offensive. But you gotta admit—one is dating oneself by using something like "an historic" (unless it's also some regional thing I'm not aware of?). To the 19th century it may not be, but definitely to the 20th :) At any rate, since we don't have a guideline recommending against using "an" before words with an aspirated "h", feel free to restore the spelling, if it's important to you. And for gods' sake, lighten up! I put a smiley into my original comment precisely because I didn't want people taking it at face value. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 10, 2015; 12:13 (UTC)

Economy of Krasnoyarsk

Seems to be non-existent...? --129.187.244.28 (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Railroad Junction on the Transiberian Railroad?

Railroad Junction on the Transiberian Railroad?? The Transiberian (or Trans-Siberian railroad runs east along southern Siberia from the Ural Mountains via Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, Lake Baikal, and the northern tip of Manchuria, to Vladivostok. It is a long and lonely railroad that runs east-west with either none, or very few railroads north or south of it, except some old railroads into and across Manchuria (the old, old routing of the Transiberian railroad before it was rerouted to avoid Chinese and Japanese territory). Thus for thousands of miles around Krasnoyarsk, there are not any significant railroads that connect with the Transiberian, and thus there cannot be any important railroad junctions in or around Krasnoyarsk.
Siberia is not like the United States, Canada, Western Europe, India, or Southern Africa, where railroads go north-south, east-west, and diagonally, and they have junctions with other main lines every few hundred kilometers. Krasnoyarsk is not a place like Minneapolis-St. Paul, where the railroads go southeast to Chicago, east to Lake Superior, north to Canada (such as to Winnipeg), west to Washington State, southwest to Denver, and south to the Gulf of Mexico. Canada even has a railroad north to Hudson Bay on the Arctic Ocean, and from there a traveler (or cargo) can go to Winnipeg, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Chicago, and numerous places on the Gulf of Mexico and along the Rio Grande.
In Siberia, the only way to the Arctic Ocean is by aircraft, by snowcat, or by snowshoes. Also, there are not very strong rail connections between Russia and China because those two counties have not been on good diplomatic and economic relationships for many decades.47.215.211.16 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]