User talk:WikipediaHelper123

September 2016

Hello, I'm Yintan. An edit that you recently made to Jack Helm ‎ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Yintan 14:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Helm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 15:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{Transcribed from user talk page}:

Dear GenQuest

Please stop removing my hard work, I have worked for almost 3 days now to find this picture of my great great grandfather Jack Helm, I think it is very disrespectful what you are doing. Please stop. Thank you. -Martha — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikipediaHelper123 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use your energy and obvious computer talent to actually be constructive and help the project, instead of being a jerk-off? Just wondering. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 15:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

WikipediaHelper123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked unfairly, simply because a user did not believe that I had pictures of my great great grandfather.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked unfairly, simply because a user did not believe that I had pictures of my great great grandfather. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked unfairly, simply because a user did not believe that I had pictures of my great great grandfather. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked unfairly, simply because a user did not believe that I had pictures of my great great grandfather. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}