Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 January 26

26 January 2017

File:National Bank of New Zealand logo.svg

File:National Bank of New Zealand logo.svg (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (article|XfD|restore)

Lack of consensus; no discussion since 15 June 2016. There is no rationale for treating the National Bank of New Zealand differently to Lloyds Bank Canada, Lloyds Bank California and Lloyds Associated Banking Company. All four entities used the undifferenced black horse device. 2.27.81.170 (talk) 17:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: There is discussion relevant to this at User talk:Nthep#IP 2.28.71.127. Also, since IP 2.27.81.170 (the IP who started this review), IP 2.28.71.127 (the IP who posted on the closing admin's user talk) and IP 2.27.75.26 (the IP who participated in the FFD discussion whose close is being reviewed) are quite possibly the same person. If that's the case then it might be helpful for everyone who participates in this DRV if that's made clear, just to avoid any misunderstanding or confusion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
• Endorse The dialectical reasoning at this WP:FFD discussion would not have disgraced the Council of Trent. Lack of sensible rationale has never been a disadvantage on these occasions. Thincat (talk) 10:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
• Endorse. Properly closed. See advice at Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
• Endorse weakly, consensus seems clear. Renomination is possible. Stifle (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment. Not sure how the "consensus seems clear". There were two editors discussing: one for deletion and one (myself) against. 2.27.92.11 (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)