Jump to content

Talk:Caesium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sanasazi (talk | contribs) at 03:18, 28 March 2017 (→‎an attempt to be helpful Comment: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleCaesium is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starCaesium is part of the Alkali metals series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 29, 2010.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
February 27, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 5, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
December 21, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject iconSpoken Wikipedia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Template:Vital article

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconElements FA‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
FAThis article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Caesium. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metallic cesium is NOT yellow

The article wrongly stated that metallic cesium is yellow-colored. It's not. Pure metallic cesium is colorless like most metals, but takes on a yellow hue when exposed to oxygen. See here http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Ce-Co/Cesium.html I have corrected the error. HandsomeMrToad (talk) 12:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should have thought that Greenwood and Earnshaw was a more reliable source than chemistryexplained.com. The oxidation explanation has been given by many others, but was already refuted in 1984. Addison's The Chemistry of the Liquid Alkali Metals explains: "When free from surface contamination, the metals Li, Na, K and Rb are silver-bright and lustrous. Caesium, however, is pale gold in colour in both solid and liquid states; coupled with the low density, and the low viscosity of the liquid, it surely must be the most attractive element in the periodic table. Earlier workers attributed the colour to the presence of trace amounts of oxide impurity, and certainly the gold colour does darken on the addition of oxygen. However, intensive purification of the metal by all available methods in the writer's laboratory over several years has not succeeded in removing the colour, and we have no doubt that caesium metal is indeed pale golden in colour." An explanation in terms of sd overlaps follows. I've reinstated the statement of golden-yellow colour. (Similarly, the heavy alkaline earth metals Ca, Sr, Ba are pale yellow, as are the divalent lanthanides Eu and Yb.) Double sharp (talk) 09:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
1. Look at the image in the article. Does that look "pale yellow" to you?
2. One chemist's failure to remove the yellow color experimentally is not "refutation" of the assertion that the pure metal is colorless. It shows only that total purification is a formidable challenge.
3. And, if, as you say, the heavy alkaline earth metals Ca, Sr, Ba are pale yellow, as are the divalent lanthanides Eu and Yb, then the wiki article on copper should say so, should not say "copper is one of only four elements with a color" as it does.
Cheers. HandsomeMrToad (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that chemistryexplained.com can't be taken as a definitive source here. Nor does looking at images online really help; exact colour reproduction is notoriously unreliable. But for what its worth, I think the image does indeed look slightly yellowish. SpinningSpark 00:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Exact colour reproduction is horribly unreliable for this sort of thing: at least we're not dealing with spectra, which would be completely impossible. And yet, the picture does look yellowish enough to tell, and the fact is already long since standard: everyone who is an actual chemistry professor is quoting it, and it is in such standard texts as Greenwood and Earnshaw's Chemistry of the Elements. I will change the copper article. Double sharp (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well this may not be exactly relevant and I'm not trying to be rude here, only entertaining, BUT, having said that.... LOL LOL the actual chemistry professor in your link (Richard Kaner of UCLA) says cesium is "the only other metal besides gold and copper that is not silvery in color." BUT osmium is blue!! (Wrawwwwwng, Prof!) HandsomeMrToad (talk) 09:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Possible resolution/consensus: how about describing the question of the color of cesium as CONTROVERSIAL (both here and in the wiki article on copper)? Some sources say pale yellow, others say colorless, the truth is very difficult to measure because it's hard to verify that a sample is really pure of oxides. HandsomeMrToad (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Osmium is a bit blue rather than pure metallic-silver according to our article text, and its photo, and all over the internet. DMacks (talk) 11:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Osmium is silvery-bluish, and the blue tinge is not anywhere near as intense as it is for the yellow of caesium and gold. Double sharp (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
chemistryexplained.com cites three refs:
  • Emsley, John (2001). Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Greenwood, Norman N., and Earnshaw, A. (1997). Chemistry of the Elements , 2nd edition. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Lide, David R., ed. (2000). CRC Handbook of Chemistry & Physics , 81st edition. New York: CRC Press.
Double sharp says that this Greenwood and Shaw ref actually says it's actually gold. I just checked the Emsley ref's entry for ""Caesium or Cesium (USA)", which states that it is "gold-coloured" without further qualification. Anyone have a CRC handy? DMacks (talk) 11:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the quote from Greenwood and Earnshaw (p. 74): "All [group 1 metals] are silvery-white except caesium which is golden yellow; in fact, caesium is one of only three metallic elements which are intensely coloured, the other two being copper and gold (see also pp. 112, 1177, 1232 [these pages detail some of the less intensely coloured metals, like Ca, Co, Zn, Sr, Cd, Ba, Eu, Yb])." Double sharp (talk) 12:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that it is reasonable to describe the issue as controversial, unless there are some recent RS saying, for instance, that Greenwood & Earnshaw (or whoever) are talking out of the wrong orifice. Or we have an RS that out and out declares that the issue is controversial. Using out of date or not so reliable sources is not good enough to demonstrate a controversy. Saying in the article that there is a controversy without something reliable to back it up is WP:SYNTH. SpinningSpark 15:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

an attempt to be helpful Comment

as proven in other articles (thankfully few) i have been proven to know very little about how to 'set things out' in wikipedia... however this comment is intended to help. last thing i want ever is to start a war. so please dont get the wrong idea. im no scientist - i really only know stuff from looking it up. this article says caesium is one of five elements... i googled 'what elements are liquid at room temperature' and got the following answer. Liquids around room temperature. The only liquid elements at standard temperature and pressure are bromine (Br) and mercury (Hg). Although, elements caesium (Cs), rubidium (Rb), Francium (Fr) and Gallium (Ga) become liquid at or just above room temperature. my knowledge isnt near good enough to debate. i wanted only to comment and hope someone found it useful, then go away. have a great day.